Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix performance downgrade by reverting code to previous #2565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

uncleempty
Copy link
Contributor

@uncleempty uncleempty commented Dec 27, 2024

ticket: https://oat-sa.atlassian.net/browse/LSI-5144

this PR aims to revert the code introduced in #2383 which causes performance drop.

Unfortunately, this fix cannot be directly tested in terms of situation where performance drop has happened. In situations different from benchmark or real campaign, meaning without quite heavy load, - it would just work not causing and not solving anything.

Grafana access would be shared via Keeper.

Grafana board with the benchmark attempt using the less-performant code: link. As it may fail because of the time zones, the time range is 2024-12-26 14:17:30 CET to 2024-12-26 14:34:30. Benchmarking attempt was cancelled, when CPU usage went over 90%.

Grafana board with the benchmark attempt, reverting the less-performant code: link. As it may fail because of the time zones, the time range is 2024-12-27 11:56:30 CET to 2024-12-27 12:38:30. Benchmarking attempt was finished not going higher than 66% CPU.

Copy link

Version

Target Version 48.18.1
Last version 48.18.0

There are 0 BREAKING CHANGE, 0 feature, 0 fix

Copy link

Front-end summary Node 18

💯 Total ✅ Passed ⏭️ Skipped ❌ Failed
709 709 0 0

@uncleempty uncleempty merged commit 796bc1c into develop Jan 10, 2025
5 checks passed
@uncleempty uncleempty deleted the fix/LSI-5144/performance-downgrade branch January 10, 2025 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants