-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/aut 3590/add metadata check on import #2454
Feat/aut 3590/add metadata check on import #2454
Conversation
… as metaMetadta lom objects
Front-end summary Node 18
|
… feat/aut-3590/add-metadata-check-on-import # Conflicts: # models/classes/metadata/ChecksumGenerator.php
… feat/aut-3590/add-metadata-check-on-import
…feat/AUT-3590/inject-metadata-into-resources
…-on-import' into feat/aut-3590/add-metadata-check-on-import
…-on-import' into feat/aut-3590/add-metadata-check-on-import
…github.com/oat-sa/extension-tao-testqti into feat/aut-3590/add-metadata-check-on-import
…-on-import' into feat/aut-3590/add-metadata-check-on-import
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remember to update composer.json before merge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- New code is covered by tests (if applicable)
- Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
- New code is respecting code style rules
- New code is respecting best practices
- New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
- Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
- Acceptance criteria are respected
- Pull request title and description are meaningful
return [ | ||
OntologyRdf::RDF_TYPE, | ||
taoTests_models_classes_TestsService::PROPERTY_TEST_TESTMODEL, | ||
RDFS_LABEL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we avoid using global var?
RDFS_LABEL | |
oat\generis\model\OntologyRdfs::RDFS_LABEL |
private function getIgnoredProperties(): array | ||
{ | ||
return [ | ||
OntologyRdf::RDF_TYPE, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make sense to add the list of ignored properties as a constructor param same as for metaMetadataCollectionToExport
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- New code is covered by tests (if applicable)
- Tests are running successfully (old and new ones) on my local machine (if applicable)
- New code is respecting code style rules
- New code is respecting best practices
- New code is not subject to concurrency issues (if applicable)
- Feature is working correctly on my local machine (if applicable)
- Acceptance criteria are respected
- Pull request title and description are meaningful
…github.com/oat-sa/extension-tao-testqti into feat/aut-3590/add-metadata-check-on-import
Version
There are 0 BREAKING CHANGE, 20 features, 4 fixes |
Ticket: https://oat-sa.atlassian.net/browse/AUT-3590
What's Changed
Dependencies PRs
How to test