Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(storybook): storybook enhancement and cleanup #385

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2019

Conversation

HiKaylum
Copy link
Contributor

refactored the storybook codebase for all components

re #381

Description
Refactored storybook as part of the enhancement issue

Compatibility
N/A

Caveats
N/A

refactored the storybook codebase for all components

re nostalgic-css#381
@guastallaigor guastallaigor requested a review from a team December 14, 2019 15:45
@guastallaigor guastallaigor added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 14, 2019
@BcRikko
Copy link
Member

BcRikko commented Dec 15, 2019

Thanks for your great Pull Request 😆 🎉

It will take time for me to review and merge.
Please wait a moment until it is merged. 🙇

@BcRikko BcRikko added the waiting - reviewer Waiting for the reviewer to address some situations label Dec 15, 2019
Copy link
Member

@BcRikko BcRikko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 😆
LGTM 🎉

@BcRikko BcRikko removed the waiting - reviewer Waiting for the reviewer to address some situations label Dec 16, 2019
@BcRikko BcRikko merged commit 2dcec7b into nostalgic-css:develop Dec 16, 2019
@HiKaylum HiKaylum deleted the storybook_enhancement_1 branch December 16, 2019 23:28
@BcRikko
Copy link
Member

BcRikko commented Dec 17, 2019

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.3.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants