Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix broken links in docs #1133

Closed
2 tasks done
genehack opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1137
Closed
2 tasks done

Fix broken links in docs #1133

genehack opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1137
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@genehack
Copy link
Contributor

genehack commented Aug 6, 2024

In order to implement automated link checking in RTD as part of CI, it is necessary to manually audit broken links in this repo first.

Remaining broken links:

Slack context for the above; created child issues so that I can link to them in FIXME comments in the config file, where I'm setting those two links to "ignore" temporarily, in order to get a clean doc build.

@genehack genehack added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 6, 2024
@genehack genehack self-assigned this Aug 6, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
Note: this contains 2 URLs in the `linkcheck_ignore` section that need
to be fixed; each has an associated FIXME comment linking to a Github
issue.

I'm ignoring those temporarily so that after this PR is merged, `make
linkcheck` will exit without error in this repo, which will unblock
activating linkchecking in _all_ the CI doc builds.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
I think this was supposed to highlight or focus some text, somehow?
But it wasn't doing anything, and the text in the anchor is already at
the top of the entry on wikipedia.

Removing it didn't change any behavior.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
I think this was supposed to highlight or focus some text, somehow?
But it wasn't doing anything, and the text in the anchor is already at
the top of the entry on wikipedia.

Removing it didn't change any behavior.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
Note: this contains 2 URLs in the `linkcheck_ignore` section that need
to be fixed; each has an associated FIXME comment linking to a Github
issue.

I'm ignoring those temporarily so that after this PR is merged, `make
linkcheck` will exit without error in this repo, which will unblock
activating linkchecking in _all_ the CI doc builds.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
I think this was supposed to highlight or focus some text, somehow?
But it wasn't doing anything, and the text in the anchor is already at
the top of the entry on wikipedia.

Removing it didn't change any behavior.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
* switch `tree` to `blob`, because they 301 that way
* swap `master` for `-`, for future-proofing
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
…1133]

The linkchecker doesn't recognize the text fragment thing as a real
anchor, so just exclude that from the full anchor check.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
Known-good URL is failing for technical reasons related to how
nextstrain.org handles routing datasets without a default.

[Slack context](https://bedfordlab.slack.com/archives/C0K3GS3J8/p1723571470133649)
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
GISAID is returning 301 on `www.gisaid.org` links, so let's respect it
and update our URLs.

Also correct some URLs to where they ultimately redirect.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
* switch `tree` to `blob`, because they 301 that way
* swap `master` for `-`, for future-proofing
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
Note: this contains 2 URLs in the `linkcheck_ignore` section that need
to be fixed; each has an associated FIXME comment linking to a Github
issue.

I'm ignoring those temporarily so that after this PR is merged, `make
linkcheck` will exit without error in this repo, which will unblock
activating linkchecking in _all_ the CI doc builds.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
…1133]

The linkchecker doesn't recognize the text fragment thing as a real
anchor, so just exclude that from the full anchor check.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
Known-good URL is failing for technical reasons related to how
nextstrain.org handles routing datasets without a default.

[Slack context](https://bedfordlab.slack.com/archives/C0K3GS3J8/p1723571470133649)
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
GISAID is returning 301 on `www.gisaid.org` links, so let's respect it
and update our URLs.

Also correct some URLs to where they ultimately redirect.
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
* switch `tree` to `blob`, because they 301 that way
* swap `master` for `-`, for future-proofing
genehack added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant