Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Inference API] Remove rate limiting feature flag check in BaseTransportInferenceAction and rely on noop implementation #121270

Conversation

timgrein
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up for #120400. We now provide a noop rate limiting implementation inside the InferencePlugin, if the feature flag is disabled. The noop implementation will always return false for isTaskTypeReroutingSupported regardless of the service/task-type pair.

@timgrein timgrein added >non-issue :ml Machine learning Team:ML Meta label for the ML team v9.0.0 labels Jan 30, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/ml-core (Team:ML)

@timgrein timgrein merged commit 0a8605e into elastic:main Jan 31, 2025
16 checks passed
timgrein added a commit to timgrein/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
timgrein added a commit to timgrein/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
timgrein added a commit to timgrein/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
@timgrein
Copy link
Contributor Author

timgrein commented Feb 4, 2025

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
8.x
9.0
8.18

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

timgrein added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
timgrein added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
timgrein added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
…rely on Noop implementation (#121270) (#121641)

(cherry picked from commit 0a8605e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:ml Machine learning >non-issue Team:ML Meta label for the ML team v9.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants