PREDICT: Enhance Forecast Responses #4090
Conversation
Baalmart
requested review from
sserurich,
Mnoble-19,
jordanopos and
Mozart299
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant improvements to air quality index (AQI) handling in the prediction API. The changes centralize AQI-related logic by adding a new constant Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #4090 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 11.81% 11.81%
========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 15485 15485
Branches 319 319
========================================
Hits 1829 1829
Misses 13656 13656 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/predict/api/prediction.py (4)
77-88: Simplify Conditional Statements inget_aqi_categoryFunctionThe conditional branches in the
get_aqi_category()function can be combined using a logicaloroperator for improved readability and efficiency.Apply this diff to refactor the conditionals:
def get_aqi_category(value): for category, range_info in AQI_RANGES.items(): - if range_info['max'] is None and value >= range_info['min']: + if ((range_info['max'] is None and value >= range_info['min']) or - return { - 'category': category, - 'label': range_info['label'], - **range_info - } - elif range_info['max'] is not None and range_info['min'] <= value <= range_info['max']: + (range_info['max'] is not None and range_info['min'] <= value <= range_info['max'])): return { 'category': category, 'label': range_info['label'], **range_info } return None🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
77-88: Combine
ifbranches using logicaloroperatorCombine
ifbranches(SIM114)
181-190: Refactor Repetitive Response Handling LogicThe response handling logic is repeated across multiple functions (
get_next_24hr_forecasts,get_next_1_week_forecasts,get_all_daily_forecasts,get_all_hourly_forecasts). Refactoring this code into a shared helper function can enhance maintainability and reduce duplication.Consider creating a utility function to handle the response enhancement and construction.
Also applies to: 225-234, 249-259, 272-282
247-247: Correct Typographical Error in Log MessageThere's a typo in the log message at line 247. The word "retriece" should be "retrieved".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- current_app.logger.info(f"result: result retriece", exc_info=True) + current_app.logger.info(f"result: result retrieved", exc_info=True)
339-344: Ensure Consistent Use ofget_aqi_categoryfor Health Tips FilteringWhile you've correctly used
get_aqi_category()to determine the AQI category, the health tips filtering logic still manually checks thepm2_5value againstaqi_categoryranges. Consider using the previously obtainedaqi_categoryto streamline the filtering.Apply this diff to simplify health tips filtering:
data["aqi_category"] = aqi_category data['aqi_ranges'] = AQI_RANGES -data["health_tips"] = list( - filter( - lambda x: x["aqi_category"]["max"] - >= pm2_5 - >= x["aqi_category"]["min"], - health_tips, - ) -) +data["health_tips"] = [ + tip for tip in health_tips if tip["aqi_category"]["category"] == aqi_category["category"] +]This modification enhances readability and ensures consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/predict/api/prediction.py(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
src/predict/api/prediction.py
77-88: Combine if branches using logical or operator
Combine if branches
(SIM114)
src/predict/api/prediction.py
Outdated
| # Centralized AQI Ranges Configuration | ||
| AQI_RANGES = { | ||
| "good": { | ||
| "min": 0, | ||
| "max": 9.099, | ||
| "label": "Good" | ||
| }, | ||
| "moderate": { | ||
| "min": 9.1, | ||
| "max": 35.49, | ||
| "label": "Moderate" | ||
| }, | ||
| "u4sg": { | ||
| "min": 35.5, | ||
| "max": 55.49, | ||
| "label": "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups" | ||
| }, | ||
| "unhealthy": { | ||
| "min": 55.5, | ||
| "max": 125.49, | ||
| "label": "Unhealthy" | ||
| }, | ||
| "very_unhealthy": { | ||
| "min": 125.5, | ||
| "max": 225.49, | ||
| "label": "Very Unhealthy" | ||
| }, | ||
| "hazardous": { | ||
| "min": 225.5, | ||
| "max": None, | ||
| "label": "Hazardous" | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Continuous AQI Range Coverage to Avoid Gaps
The AQI_RANGES definitions currently have gaps between categories. For instance, the "good" category ends at 9.099, while the "moderate" category starts at 9.1, leaving values between 9.099 and 9.1 uncategorized. Similar gaps exist between other categories. To provide accurate AQI categorizations for all values, please adjust the max and min values to ensure continuous coverage.
Apply this diff to adjust the ranges:
"good": {
"min": 0,
- "max": 9.099,
+ "max": 9.1,
"label": "Good"
},
"moderate": {
- "min": 9.1,
+ "min": 9.101,
"max": 35.49,
"label": "Moderate"
},
"u4sg": {
- "min": 35.5,
+ "min": 35.491,
"max": 55.49,
"label": "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups"
},
"unhealthy": {
- "min": 55.5,
+ "min": 55.491,
"max": 125.49,
"label": "Unhealthy"
},
"very_unhealthy": {
- "min": 125.5,
+ "min": 125.491,
"max": 225.49,
"label": "Very Unhealthy"
},
"hazardous": {
- "min": 225.5,
+ "min": 225.491,
"max": None,
"label": "Hazardous"
}Alternatively, consider adjusting the comparison logic in get_aqi_category() to account for these gaps.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
Predict service changes in this PR available for preview here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/predict/api/prediction.py (2)
66-89: Consider optimizing the category check logicWhile the current implementation is clear and functional, you could make it more concise by combining the conditions:
- if range_info['max'] is None and value >= range_info['min']: - return { - 'category': category, - 'label': range_info['label'], - **range_info - } - elif range_info['max'] is not None and range_info['min'] <= value <= range_info['max']: + if (range_info['max'] is None and value >= range_info['min']) or \ + (range_info['max'] is not None and range_info['min'] <= value <= range_info['max']): return { 'category': category, 'label': range_info['label'], **range_info }🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
77-88: Combine
ifbranches using logicaloroperatorCombine
ifbranches(SIM114)
246-246: Fix typo in logging messageThere's a typo in the logging message: "result retriece" should be "result retrieved"
- current_app.logger.info(f"result: result retriece", exc_info=True) + current_app.logger.info(f"result: result retrieved", exc_info=True)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
246-246: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
fprefix(F541)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/predict/api/prediction.py(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
src/predict/api/prediction.py
77-88: Combine if branches using logical or operator
Combine if branches
(SIM114)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/predict/api/prediction.py (3)
32-64: LGTM! Well-structured AQI ranges configuration
The AQI ranges are now properly defined with continuous coverage and no gaps between categories. The structure is clean and maintainable.
91-111: LGTM! Well-implemented response enhancement
The function effectively centralizes the response enhancement logic with proper error handling and logging. Good use of the Single Responsibility Principle.
181-183: LGTM! Consistent integration of AQI ranges across endpoints
The enhancement logic has been consistently integrated across all relevant endpoints, improving the overall response structure uniformity.
Also applies to: 225-227, 247-249, 270-272, 301-301, 339-344, 376-384
|
Predict service changes in this PR available for preview here |
Description
Introduces centralized AQI range management with improved modularity and consistent metadata across air quality forecast endpoints.
Changes Made
AQI_RANGESdictionary to define air quality index categoriesget_aqi_category()utility function to determine AQI categoriesenhance_forecast_response()to standardize response metadataTesting
Affected Services
Endpoints Ready for Testing
/api/v2/predict/daily-forecastAPI Documentation Updated?
Additional Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit