Forecast routes with batch processing and enhanced health tips #4110
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive enhancements to air quality forecast processing and health tips retrieval. The changes centralize AQI range configurations, improve error handling for health tips API interactions, and optimize forecast processing. The modifications focus on creating more robust, flexible methods for retrieving and presenting air quality health recommendations across different scenarios. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ForecastAPI
participant HealthTipsAPI
participant ProcessingLogic
Client->>ForecastAPI: Request Forecast
ForecastAPI-->>ProcessingLogic: Return Forecast Data
ProcessingLogic->>HealthTipsAPI: Fetch Health Tips
alt Health Tips API Success
HealthTipsAPI-->>ProcessingLogic: Return Health Tips
else Health Tips API Failure
ProcessingLogic->>ProcessingLogic: Use Static Health Tips
end
ProcessingLogic-->>Client: Enhanced Forecast with Health Tips
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #4110 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 11.88% 11.88%
========================================
Files 117 117
Lines 15549 15549
Branches 319 319
========================================
Hits 1848 1848
Misses 13701 13701 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/predict/api/prediction.py (2)
7-7: Remove unused import “Optional”.
The symbol 'Optional' is never used in the file. Consider removing it to keep imports clean.-from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Union, Callable +from typing import Dict, List, Union, Callable🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
7-7:
typing.Optionalimported but unusedRemove unused import:
typing.Optional(F401)
157-157: Remove extraneous f-string prefix.
This f-string has no placeholder and can be converted to a normal string.- "message": f"Forecasts successfully retrieved.", + "message": "Forecasts successfully retrieved.",🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
157-157: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
fprefix(F541)
src/predict/api/helpers.py (2)
566-569: Combine conditional branches with a logical or.
Merging these if statements improves readability by reducing nested conditionals.-for category, range_info in aqi_ranges.items(): - if range_info['max'] is None and pm2_5_value >= range_info['min']: - return DEFAULT_HEALTH_TIPS.get(category, {}) - elif range_info['max'] is not None and range_info['min'] <= pm2_5_value <= range_info['max']: - return DEFAULT_HEALTH_TIPS.get(category, {}) +for category, range_info in aqi_ranges.items(): + if ( + (range_info['max'] is None and pm2_5_value >= range_info['min']) + or + (range_info['max'] is not None and range_info['min'] <= pm2_5_value <= range_info['max']) + ): + return DEFAULT_HEALTH_TIPS.get(category, {})🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
566-569: Combine
ifbranches using logicaloroperatorCombine
ifbranches(SIM114)
590-590: Rename “site_id” to “_site_id” if it’s unused.
The loop variable “site_id” is unused inside the loop body. Renaming it to “_site_id” clarifies it’s unused.Example fix for lines around 590 and 629:
-for site_id, forecasts in results.items(): +for _site_id, forecasts in results.items(): for forecast in forecasts: ...Also applies to: 629-629
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
590-590: Loop control variable
site_idnot used within loop bodyRename unused
site_idto_site_id(B007)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/predict/api/helpers.py(3 hunks)src/predict/api/prediction.py(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
src/predict/api/prediction.py
7-7: typing.Optional imported but unused
Remove unused import: typing.Optional
(F401)
157-157: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous f prefix
(F541)
src/predict/api/helpers.py
566-569: Combine if branches using logical or operator
Combine if branches
(SIM114)
590-590: Loop control variable site_id not used within loop body
Rename unused site_id to _site_id
(B007)
621-621: Undefined name Dict
(F821)
622-622: Undefined name List
(F821)
624-624: Undefined name Dict
(F821)
629-629: Loop control variable site_id not used within loop body
Rename unused site_id to _site_id
(B007)
| results: Dict, | ||
| cached_health_tips: List, | ||
| language: str | ||
| ) -> Dict: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add import for Dict and List.
Python’s typing “Dict” and “List” references are undefined. Ensure they are imported properly.
+from typing import Dict, ListCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
621-621: Undefined name Dict
(F821)
622-622: Undefined name List
(F821)
624-624: Undefined name Dict
(F821)
|
Predict service changes in this PR available for preview here |
|
Predict service changes in this PR available for preview here |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| return jsonify({ | ||
| "message": "An error occurred processing the forecast.", | ||
| "error": str(e), # Include the exception message for debugging | ||
| "success": False, | ||
| }), 500 |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Information exposure through an exception Medium
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 22 days ago
To fix the problem, we should modify the handle_error function to return a generic error message to the user instead of including the exception message. The detailed error information should still be logged on the server for debugging purposes. This way, we can prevent sensitive information from being exposed to external users while still retaining the ability to debug issues.
| @@ -164,13 +164,12 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| def handle_error(e: Exception) -> tuple: | ||
| """ Handle errors by logging and returning a standardized error response. """ | ||
| # Log the error with detailed information | ||
| current_app.logger.error(f"Error processing forecast: {str(e)}", exc_info=True) | ||
|
|
||
| # Return a detailed error response including the exception message | ||
| return jsonify({ | ||
| "message": "An error occurred processing the forecast.", | ||
| "error": str(e), # Include the exception message for debugging | ||
| "success": False, | ||
| }), 500 | ||
| def handle_error(e: Exception) -> tuple: | ||
| """ Handle errors by logging and returning a standardized error response. """ | ||
| # Log the error with detailed information | ||
| current_app.logger.error(f"Error processing forecast: {str(e)}", exc_info=True) | ||
|
|
||
| # Return a generic error response without the exception message | ||
| return jsonify({ | ||
| "message": "An error occurred processing the forecast.", | ||
| "success": False, | ||
| }), 500 | ||
|
|
|
Predict service changes in this PR available for preview here |
|
Predict service changes in this PR available for preview here |
Description
Optimise forecast routes with batch processing and enhanced health tips handling
Changes Made
Testing
Affected Services
Endpoints Ready for Testing
API Documentation Updated?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation