Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: migrate WFX to WPUNDIAI #917

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

feat: migrate WFX to WPUNDIAI #917

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Jan 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for a new wrapped token called "Wrapped Pundi AIFX Token" (WPUNDIAI)
    • Implemented token migration process from WFX to WPUNDIAI
  • Tests

    • Enhanced upgrade testing with new token verification checks
  • Chores

    • Updated linter script to allow one additional #nosec pattern occurrence

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive upgrade mechanism for a wrapped token called WPUNDIAI (Wrapped Pundi AIFX Token). The changes span multiple files, including a new migration function in wrap_token.go, upgrade logic modifications in upgrade.go, and enhanced testing capabilities in upgrade_test.go. The implementation focuses on transitioning from an existing WFX token to the new wrapped token, with detailed state migration, storage management, and validation processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/upgrade_test.go Added checkWrapToken function to validate wrap token properties during upgrade testing
app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go Integrated migrationWFXToWPUNDIAI function call in testnet and mainnet upgrade processes
app/upgrades/v8/wrap_token.go New file with migration logic, utility functions for token conversion, and management
scripts/linter.sh Updated #nosec pattern limit from 5 to 6

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant App as Upgrade Process
    participant Keeper as EVM Keeper
    participant Token as Wrap Token Migration

    App->>Keeper: Initiate Token Migration
    Keeper->>Token: migrationWFXToWPUNDIAI()
    Token-->>Token: Scale Down Token Supply
    Token-->>Token: Update Token Metadata
    Token-->>Keeper: Migration Complete
    Keeper-->>App: Upgrade Successful
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, token migration dance,
WFX to WPUNDIAI, a blockchain romance!
Scaling down with rabbit-like grace,
Upgrade complete, we've won the race!
Migration magic, code so bright ✨

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
app/upgrades/v8/wrap_token.go (2)

20-25: Document the purpose of storage slot numbers.

The storage slot numbers appear to be magic numbers without clear documentation explaining their significance or how they were chosen.

Add comments explaining the purpose and derivation of each slot number:

 const (
+    // Slot for storing the token name in EVM storage
     nameSlot        = 201
+    // Slot for storing the token symbol in EVM storage
     symbolSlot      = 202
+    // Slot for storing the total supply in EVM storage
     totalSupplySlot = 204
+    // Last slot used in storage layout
     lastSlot        = 300
 )

89-93: Improve function naming and documentation.

The function name hardcodes the scaling factor, making it less flexible for future changes.

Consider making the scaling factor configurable:

-func scaleDownBy100(valueByte []byte) []byte {
+func scaleDown(valueByte []byte, factor int64) []byte {
     value := big.NewInt(0).SetBytes(valueByte)
-    newValue := value.Div(value, big.NewInt(100))
+    newValue := value.Div(value, big.NewInt(factor))
     return common.BigToHash(newValue).Bytes()
 }
app/upgrade_test.go (1)

190-209: Enhance test coverage for token migration.

The test verifies basic token properties but lacks validation of the scaled-down values and state migration.

Add tests for scaled-down values:

 func checkWrapToken(t *testing.T, ctx sdk.Context, myApp *app.App) {
     t.Helper()
     erc20TokenKeeper := contract.NewERC20TokenKeeper(myApp.EvmKeeper)
     wrapTokenAddress := nextversion.GetWFXAddress(ctx.ChainID())
+
+    // Test basic properties
     name, err := erc20TokenKeeper.Name(ctx, wrapTokenAddress)
     require.NoError(t, err)
     assert.EqualValues(t, nextversion.WrapTokenName, name)
     symbol, err := erc20TokenKeeper.Symbol(ctx, wrapTokenAddress)
     require.NoError(t, err)
     assert.EqualValues(t, nextversion.WrapTokenSymbol, symbol)
     decimals, err := erc20TokenKeeper.Decimals(ctx, wrapTokenAddress)
     require.NoError(t, err)
     assert.EqualValues(t, 18, decimals)
     owner, err := erc20TokenKeeper.Owner(ctx, wrapTokenAddress)
     require.NoError(t, err)
     assert.EqualValues(t, common.BytesToAddress(myApp.AccountKeeper.GetModuleAddress(erc20types.ModuleName).Bytes()), owner)
     supply, err := erc20TokenKeeper.TotalSupply(ctx, wrapTokenAddress)
     require.NoError(t, err)
     assert.EqualValues(t, 1, supply.Cmp(big.NewInt(0)))
+
+    // Test scaled-down values
+    testBalance := big.NewInt(1000)
+    testAddress := common.HexToAddress("0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890")
+    err = erc20TokenKeeper.SetBalance(ctx, wrapTokenAddress, testAddress, testBalance)
+    require.NoError(t, err)
+    
+    balance, err := erc20TokenKeeper.BalanceOf(ctx, wrapTokenAddress, testAddress)
+    require.NoError(t, err)
+    expectedBalance := new(big.Int).Div(testBalance, big.NewInt(100))
+    assert.Zero(t, balance.Cmp(expectedBalance))
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e86610 and 5f86485.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • app/upgrade_test.go (3 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go (2 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v8/wrap_token.go (1 hunks)
  • scripts/linter.sh (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/linter.sh (1)

7-7: LGTM!

The increase in #nosec limit is justified by the addition of the new security-related code in wrap_token.go.

app/upgrades/v8/wrap_token.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/upgrades/v8/wrap_token.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +100 to +102

migrationWFXToWPUNDIAI(ctx, app.EvmKeeper)

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for migration function.

The migration function is called without error handling, which could lead to incomplete upgrades if it fails.

Add error handling:

-    migrationWFXToWPUNDIAI(ctx, app.EvmKeeper)
+    if err := migrationWFXToWPUNDIAI(ctx, app.EvmKeeper); err != nil {
+        return err
+    }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
migrationWFXToWPUNDIAI(ctx, app.EvmKeeper)
if err := migrationWFXToWPUNDIAI(ctx, app.EvmKeeper); err != nil {
return err
}

app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@fx0x55 fx0x55 merged commit f12c298 into main Jan 16, 2025
15 checks passed
@fx0x55 fx0x55 deleted the fx0x55/update-wfx-data branch January 16, 2025 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants