Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] l10n_es_aeat_mod303: Remove field 96 #3927

Merged

Conversation

pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Forward-port of #3924

It was incorrectly mapped to "recargo de equivalencia" base amounts, which is not correct, as that base amounts are already included in regular operations, so it appears duplicated.

This field is for being filled in specific cases where the subject is on the special fiscal regime "Recargo de equivalencia".

@Tecnativa TT52996

It was incorrectly mapped to "recargo de equivalencia" base amounts,
which is not correct, as that base amounts are already included in
regular operations, so it appears duplicated.

This field is for being filled in specific cases where the subject is
on the special fiscal regime "Recargo de equivalencia".

TT52996
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Jan 17, 2025
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member Author

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-3927-by-pedrobaeza-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 0e29d9c into OCA:16.0 Jan 17, 2025
5 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 7f88e50. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 16.0-fix-l10n_es_aeat_mod303-field_96 branch January 17, 2025 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants