[17.0][FIX] l10n_es_aeat_mod303: Remove field 96 #3929
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It was incorrectly mapped to "recargo de equivalencia" base amounts, which is not correct, as that base amounts are already included in regular operations, so it appears duplicated. This field is for being filled in specific cases where the subject is on the special fiscal regime "Recargo de equivalencia". The tests have been changed, as now field 88 doesn't contain this field. TT52996
pedrobaeza
force-pushed
the
17.0-fix-l10n_es_aeat_mod303-field_96
branch
from
8a5d1ff to
7338bec
Compare
|
/ocabot merge patch |
|
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 34567c5. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Forward-port + adaptation of #3924 and #3927
It was incorrectly mapped to "recargo de equivalencia" base amounts, which is not correct, as that base amounts are already included in regular operations, so it appears duplicated.
This field is for being filled in specific cases where the subject is on the special fiscal regime "Recargo de equivalencia".
The tests have been changed, as now field 88 doesn't contain this field.
@Tecnativa TT52996