Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow only valid values for theme query string #2745

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

gregberge
Copy link
Contributor

Fix GITBOOK-OPEN-1X8D

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a32b9b2

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
gitbook Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 14, 2025

GitBook Preview
Latest commit: https://b73e7d1c.gitbook-open.pages.dev
PR: https://pr2745.gitbook-open.pages.dev

Copy link
Member

@taranvohra taranvohra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use api.CustomizationThemeMode

@gregberge gregberge force-pushed the allow-only-valid-values-for-theme branch from fa65c78 to 370d6a7 Compare January 14, 2025 11:13
Copy link

argos-ci bot commented Jan 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Argos notifications ↗︎

Build Status Details Updated (UTC)
default (Inspect) 👍 Changes approved 5 changed Jan 14, 2025, 11:24 AM

@gregberge gregberge requested a review from taranvohra January 14, 2025 11:16
@gregberge gregberge merged commit cb100d5 into main Jan 14, 2025
9 checks passed
@gregberge gregberge deleted the allow-only-valid-values-for-theme branch January 14, 2025 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants