Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bgpd: fix add label support to EVPN AD routes #17985

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

pguibert6WIND
Copy link
Member

When peering with an EVPN device from other vendor, FRR acting as route reflector is not able to read nor transmit the label value.

Actually, EVPN AD routes completely ignore the label value in the code, whereas in some functionalities like evpn-vpws, it is authorised to carry and propagate label value.

Fix this by handling the label value.

When peering with an EVPN device from other vendor, FRR acting as route
reflector is not able to read nor transmit the label value.

Actually, EVPN AD routes completely ignore the label value in the code,
whereas in some functionalities like evpn-vpws, it is authorised to
carry and propagate label value.

Fix this by handling the label value.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <[email protected]>
@ton31337
Copy link
Member

ton31337 commented Feb 4, 2025

@Mergifyio backport stable/10.2 stable/10.1 stable/10.0

Copy link

mergify bot commented Feb 4, 2025

backport stable/10.2 stable/10.1 stable/10.0

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Member

@riw777 riw777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good ... waiting on freeze

@riw777 riw777 merged commit 0735013 into FRRouting:master Feb 4, 2025
18 checks passed
riw777 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
bgpd: fix add label support to EVPN AD routes (backport #17985)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants