fix: commit strategy for mls commit missing reference [WPB-15871] 🍒

[github-actions]

WPB-15871 [Android] Don't apply recover strategy 3 on mls-commit-missing-references

This PR was automatically cherry-picked based on the following PR:

• fix: commit strategy for mls commit missing reference [WPB-15871] #3272

Original PR description:

---

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Changed commit strategy from KEEP_AND_RETRY to DISCARD_AND_RETRY for mls-commit-missing-references error

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 418 tests  +3   3 310 ✅ +3   5m 27s ⏱️ -22s
  584 suites ±0     108 💤 ±0 
  584 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 89c0707. ± Comparison against base commit 3f11819.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	fix/mls-missing-reference-commit-strategy-cherry-pick
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	microseconds (µs)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	684.85
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	403,952.83
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,343,128.11
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	22,177.34

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.87%. Comparing base (3f11819) to head (89c0707).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3276   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    50.87%   50.87%           
========================================
  Files         1606     1606           
  Lines        57189    57189           
  Branches      5105     5105           
========================================
+ Hits         29093    29094    +1     
+ Misses       26081    26080    -1     
  Partials      2015     2015           

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3f11819...89c0707. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/mls-missing-reference-commit-strategy-cherry-pick
Commit report: ffdbc21
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3310 Passed, 108 Skipped, 1m 0.05s Total Time

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud