feat: conversation folders [WPB-14309]

[Garzas]

WPB-14309 Handle conversation folders and favorites from events

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

• handling label events with user and favorites folder with conversation ids
• added sync step to fetch all labels
• added functionality to create favorite folder if it does not exist on backend
• extracted method toModelConversationWithEvents to parse ConversationDetailsWithEvents from dao to model
• added use cases to get favorite folder and to observe favorite conversations

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 284 tests  +7   3 177 ✅ +7   5m 6s ⏱️ +38s
  559 suites +2     107 💤 ±0 
  559 files   +2       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit c07e618. ± Comparison against base commit f2ae88b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	feat/conversation-folders
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: The following Measure does not have a Threshold. Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated!

• Latency

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	nanoseconds (ns)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	662,220.96
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	582,489,421.14
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,325,344,024.72
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,477,269.15

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: feat/conversation-folders
Commit report: 9bbaa06
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3177 Passed, 107 Skipped, 38.55s Total Time

[yamilmedina]

Looking solid! I have some questions and small improvements, here and there that we can take a look 🚀

[saleniuk]

👏

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 48.40000% with 129 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.20%. Comparing base (f2ae88b) to head (c07e618).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...m/network/api/authenticated/properties/LabelDTO.kt	0.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
.../api/authenticated/notification/EventContentDTO.kt	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
.../conversation/folders/ConversationFolderMappers.kt	51.72%	12 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...nversation/folders/ConversationFolderRepository.kt	66.66%	12 Missing ⚠️
...lium/logic/data/conversation/ConversationFolder.kt	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
...rveConversationListDetailsWithEventsUseCaseImpl.kt	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
...re/conversation/folder/GetFavoriteFolderUseCase.kt	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
...in/com/wire/kalium/logic/data/event/EventMapper.kt	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
.../logic/data/conversation/ConversationRepository.kt	50.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...um/logic/feature/conversation/ConversationScope.kt	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
... and 8 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3106      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    54.21%   54.20%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files         1196     1205       +9     
  Lines        35596    35806     +210     
  Branches      3625     3641      +16     
===========================================
+ Hits         19300    19410     +110     
- Misses       14896    14993      +97     
- Partials      1400     1403       +3     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...Main/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/logger/KaliumLogger.kt	69.79% <100.00%> (ø)
...lium/logic/data/conversation/ConversationMapper.kt	57.84% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
...n/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/logic/data/event/Event.kt	78.53% <100.00%> (+0.36%)	⬆️
.../com/wire/kalium/logic/data/sync/SlowSyncStatus.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...logic/sync/receiver/UserPropertiesEventReceiver.kt	74.07% <100.00%> (+21.13%)	⬆️
...com/wire/kalium/logic/sync/slow/SlowSyncManager.kt	93.02% <ø> (ø)
.../com/wire/kalium/logic/sync/slow/SlowSyncWorker.kt	96.61% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
...um/persistence/dao/conversation/ConversationDAO.kt	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ersistence/dao/conversation/ConversationDAOImpl.kt	72.98% <100.00%> (ø)
...ao/conversation/folder/ConversationFolderEntity.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 20 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f2ae88b...c07e618. Read the comment docs.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[MohamadJaara]

this should be the other way around if you want to query conversations by folder