feat: Hooks for Memberships Managers! #31
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…its in favour of `NonFungiblesMemberships` structure.
…d support hooks.
olanod
approved these changes
Jan 1, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Last Pull Request of the year ;)
This Pull Request introduces a
WithHooksstructure to allow memberships managers to have configurable hooks that extend the functionality of them independent of its inherent design.This would allow, for example, handling memberships based off on non-fungibles to do some logic after a membership is assigned (i.e. copy some attributes to the newly assigned membership), released (i.e. synchronizing gas tank information, if applies), or rank set (i.e. updating polls).