Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uzbekistan Update #924

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ziplock1
Copy link
Contributor

@ziplock1 ziplock1 commented Jan 3, 2025

Description of changes

This PR consists next changes:

  • Updated boundary between UTTR and UAII FIRs
  • XX14 area separated from UCFO boudaries to be displayed when UTTR online
  • Fixed airports data for the whole Uzbekistan

image

Reason and motivation

This update is required because of outdated boundaries/airports data.

Approved contributior?

  • I am on the approved contributers list
  • I have sent an request by email to get approved
  • Someone on the approved contributer list will review this request

@ziplock1
Copy link
Contributor Author

ziplock1 commented Jan 3, 2025

@Adrian2k Hello! I've seen your comment on previous request, so let me say just a few words about it:

  • XX14 area as per Uzbekistan AIP belongs to Tashkent ACC Sector East.
  • If we are talking about two polygons inside single vACC than I may assume that it is not a big deal, as VATSIM Radar can display it properly. However, I'm still waiting for @daniluk4000 comments on it...

@daniluk4000
Copy link
Contributor

daniluk4000 commented Jan 3, 2025

image

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@NelisV NelisV left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Polygons look good, with the exception of UTTR. You've created a multipolygon with an 'exclave' VATSPY cannot display this. Best solution is to split it into two separate sectors or keep them connected somehow.
image

@ziplock1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Polygons look good, with the exception of UTTR. You've created a multipolygon with an 'exclave' VATSPY cannot display this. Best solution is to split it into two separate sectors or keep them connected somehow. image

VATSpy can display this. The only thing is that it can’t display tag for both polygons. Does it really make sense?

@ziplock1 ziplock1 requested a review from NelisV January 11, 2025 13:49
@ziplock1
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

@NelisV These changes were tested out both in VATSIM Radar and VATSpy and are looking to be functional. Exactly the same way it works with UBBA ('exclave' UBBA-S sector) where 2 polygons are inside one FIR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants