Upgrade to Bazel 8.0.0

[KateBlueSky]

Description

Changes to upgrade to Bazel 8.0.0

• Created a MODULE.bazel file with the dependencies in it.
• Removed the WORKSPACE file
• Changed the compiler registration to be in the MODULE.bazle file (https://bazel.build/external/migration#register-toolchains)
• Added the --noincompatible_disallow_empty_glob to the bazelrc for change in native.glob behavior in bazel 8.0.0 vs bazel 7.0.0 (https://bazel.build/reference/command-line-reference)

All of these changes can be found in the bazel migration guide (https://bazel.build/external/migration)

---

PR should start as a draft, then move to ready for review state after CI is passed and all applicable checkboxes are closed.
This approach ensures that reviewers don't spend extra time asking for regular requirements.

You can remove a checkbox as not applicable only if it doesn't relate to this PR in any way.
For example, PR with docs update doesn't require checkboxes for performance while PR with any change in actual code should have checkboxes and justify how this code change is expected to affect performance (or justification should be self-evident).

Checklist to comply with before moving PR from draft:

PR completeness and readability

• I have reviewed my changes thoroughly before submitting this pull request.
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes or created a separate PR with update and provided its number in the description, if necessary.
• Git commit message contains an appropriate signed-off-by string (see CONTRIBUTING.md for details).
• I have added a respective label(s) to PR if I have a permission for that.
• I have resolved any merge conflicts that might occur with the base branch.

Testing

• I have run it locally and tested the changes extensively.
• All CI jobs are green or I have provided justification why they aren't.
• I have extended testing suite if new functionality was introduced in this PR.

Performance

• I have measured performance for affected algorithms using scikit-learn_bench and provided at least summary table with measured data, if performance change is expected.
• I have provided justification why performance has changed or why changes are not expected.
• I have provided justification why quality metrics have changed or why changes are not expected.
• I have extended benchmarking suite and provided corresponding scikit-learn_bench PR if new measurable functionality was introduced in this PR.

[ethanglaser]

/intelci: run

[ethanglaser]

Suggested change

	bazel_dep(name = "platforms", version = "0.0.5")
	bazel_dep(name = "platforms", version = "0.0.10")

May resolve WARNING: For repository 'platforms', the root module requires module version [email protected], but got [email protected] in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off. Unless there is a specific reason to set to 0.0.5.

[ethanglaser]

may need to add another bazel_dep (rules_android) to resolve WARNING: Couldn't auto load rules or symbols, because no dependency on module/repository 'rules_android' found. This will result in a failure if there's a reference to those rules or symbols.

[ethanglaser]

The docs on this aren't super clear to me - what would happen if this flag is not added?

[ethanglaser]

add new line at eof

[ethanglaser]

add new line at eof