Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: default ratelimits #2103

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

fix: default ratelimits #2103

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

chronark
Copy link
Collaborator

@chronark chronark commented Sep 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved handling of rate limits to prevent duplicate entries for the "default" rate limit, enhancing efficiency.
  • Tests

    • Introduced a new test suite to validate the API behavior with default rate limit settings, ensuring accurate response and limit verification.

@chronark chronark requested a review from perkinsjr as a code owner September 17, 2024 15:21
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 17, 2024 3:31pm
play ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 17, 2024 3:31pm
www ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 17, 2024 3:31pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
planetfall ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 3:31pm
workflows ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 3:31pm

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 17, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 85627bb

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the KeyService class to improve the handling of rate limits by preventing duplicate entries for the "default" rate limit. A new test suite has been added to the v1_keys_verifyKey.test.ts file to verify the functionality of the API with the default rate limit settings, ensuring that the key behaves as expected under defined rate limit parameters.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts Modified KeyService class to skip adding duplicate "default" rate limit entries in the ratelimits object.
apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.test.ts Added a new test suite and test case to verify API behavior with default ratelimit settings.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant KeyService

    Client->>API: POST /v1/keys.verifyKey
    API->>KeyService: Process request with key and ratelimit
    KeyService->>KeyService: Check if "default" ratelimit exists
    KeyService->>KeyService: Skip adding duplicate "default" ratelimit
    KeyService-->>API: Return ratelimit info and status
    API-->>Client: Return response (HTTP 200)
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2471b4 and 85627bb.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts (2)

473-479: LGTM!

The added conditional check correctly prevents duplicate entries for the "default" rate limit in the ratelimits object. This improves the efficiency of the rate limit processing.


475-478: Looks good!

The if statement correctly identifies the scenario where a "default" rate limit is already present in the ratelimits object, and the continue statement is used appropriately to skip the current iteration.

apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.test.ts (1)

387-423: LGTM!

The test suite with default ratelimit and its test case uses the on-key defined settings are implemented correctly. It enhances the test coverage by ensuring that the API correctly uses the ratelimit settings defined on the key.

The test case sets up the key with specific ratelimit settings in the database, sends a request to the /v1/keys.verifyKey endpoint, and validates the response status, key validity, and the ratelimit limit.

No issues found.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants