feat: net/http api #2057
feat: net/http api #2057
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce integration of ClickHouse into the Go application, including new migration tasks and updates to configuration files for ClickHouse connection details. New files facilitate ClickHouse interactions, such as client and schema definitions, while existing files are updated to support ClickHouse functionality, improve error handling, and enhance request logging. Additionally, middleware for metrics and logging is introduced, along with restructuring of various API routes for better handling of requests and responses. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Server
participant Clickhouse
participant API
User->>Server: Send API Request
Server->>API: Process Request
API->>Clickhouse: BufferApiRequest
Clickhouse-->>API: Acknowledge Buffering
API-->>Server: Return Response
Server-->>User: Send Response
Tip We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
deployment/config/clickhouse/etc/clickhouse-server/config.d/config.xml (1)
1-30: Review network security settings and approve configuration.The configuration for the ClickHouse server is generally well-set, with appropriate logging levels, file paths, and system settings. However, the
listen_hostis set to0.0.0.0, which allows connections from any IP address. This setting should be reviewed to ensure it aligns with the intended network security policies, especially if the server is accessible over public networks.Consider restricting this setting to specific IP addresses or ensure adequate firewall rules are in place to protect the server.
deployment/config/clickhouse/etc/clickhouse-keeper/keeper_config.xml/keeper_config.xml (1)
1-28: Review network security settings and approve configuration.The configuration for the ClickHouse Keeper is generally well-set, with appropriate logging levels, file paths, and system settings. However, the
listen_hostis set to0.0.0.0, which allows connections from any IP address. This setting should be reviewed to ensure it aligns with the intended network security policies, especially if the server is accessible over public networks.Consider restricting this setting to specific IP addresses or ensure adequate firewall rules are in place to protect the server.
packages/cache/src/swr.test.ts (1)
83-106: Enhance Test Clarity with CommentsThe test suite
with fresh=0is well-constructed and effectively tests the revalidation process. However, adding comments to explain the logic within the loop, especially the conditionif (i > 1), would enhance readability and maintainability.apps/agent/pkg/api/server.go (1)
37-37: Approved addition ofclickhousefield inServerstruct.The new
clickhousefield integrates ClickHouse functionality, enhancing the server's capability to handle events and logs. Ensure that this field is checked fornilbefore usage to prevent potential runtime panics.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
apps/agent/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (21)
- apps/agent/Taskfile.yml (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/cmd/agent/agent.go (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/config.docker.json (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/go.mod (5 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/interface.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/services.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler.go (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/server.go (4 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/client.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/flush.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/interface.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/noop.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/001_create_requests_table.sql (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/requests.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/config/agent.go (1 hunks)
- deployment/config/clickhouse/etc/clickhouse-keeper/keeper_config.xml/keeper_config.xml (1 hunks)
- deployment/config/clickhouse/etc/clickhouse-server/config.d/config.xml (1 hunks)
- deployment/config/clickhouse/etc/clickhouse-server/users.d/users.xml (1 hunks)
- deployment/docker-compose.yaml (4 hunks)
- fly (1 hunks)
- packages/cache/src/swr.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/noop.go
- fly
Additional comments not posted (29)
apps/agent/pkg/api/interface.go (1)
5-7: Interface Definition ApprovedThe
EventIngesterinterface is well-defined and aligns with Go's conventions for interface design. However, consider adding documentation to the interface and its method to enhance clarity and maintainability.apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/interface.go (1)
7-9: Interface Definition ApprovedThe
Ingesterinterface is correctly defined. However, it appears similar to theEventIngesterinterface in another package. Consider evaluating the necessity of maintaining both interfaces to avoid redundancy and confusion.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/services.go (1)
12-16: Struct Enhancement ApprovedThe addition of the
Clickhousefield to theServicesstruct is well-implemented and aligns with the integration objectives. Consider adding documentation to theServicesstruct to describe the role and usage of each field, particularly the newClickhousefield, to enhance clarity and maintainability.apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/requests.go (1)
3-14: Well-defined struct for ClickHouse integration.The
ApiRequestV1struct is well-defined with appropriate data types and ClickHouse tags. Ensure that the field names and data types align with the corresponding database schema to avoid integration issues.Run the following script to verify the alignment with the database schema:
apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/001_create_requests_table.sql (1)
1-26: Well-structured SQL script for ClickHouse table creation.The SQL script for creating the
api_requests__v1table is well-structured and includes detailed comments. Ensure that the table schema aligns with the application's data model and theApiRequestV1struct to maintain consistency across the application.Run the following script to verify the alignment with the application's data model:
apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/flush.go (1)
12-28: Well-implemented generic batch insertion function.The
flushfunction is well-implemented with appropriate error handling and use of generics. The use offault.Wrapfor error handling is consistent and provides clear, contextual error messages which are beneficial for debugging. The function signature using generics (T any) is flexible and suitable for this use case, allowing any type that can be serialized into a ClickHouse row to be processed.Consider adding a comment explaining the use of generics if this approach is not commonly used across the project, to aid other developers in understanding this choice.
apps/agent/config.docker.json (1)
47-50: Ensure secure handling of sensitive configuration data.The new ClickHouse configuration section includes sensitive information such as username and password. It's crucial to ensure that these values are securely handled and not exposed in the codebase. Using environment variables, as done here, is a good practice as it keeps sensitive data out of the source code. However, ensure that these environment variables are securely managed and not exposed in logs or error messages.
deployment/config/clickhouse/etc/clickhouse-server/users.d/users.xml (1)
1-37: Review and validate ClickHouse user configuration settings.This new XML configuration file sets various user permissions and system settings for ClickHouse. It's important to ensure that these settings are appropriate for your use case. For example, the
<max_memory_usage>setting is quite high, which could impact system performance if not monitored. Additionally, the<access_management>and<named_collection_control>settings enable significant control over user access, which is good for security but should be carefully managed to avoid misconfigurations. Consider reviewing these settings with a database administrator to ensure they are optimized for security and performance.apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/client.go (4)
15-20: Struct Definition ApprovedThe
Clickhousestruct is well-defined, with appropriate types for managing connections, logging, and batch processing.
22-27: Struct Definition ApprovedThe
Configstruct is appropriately designed to encapsulate the necessary configuration parameters for establishing a ClickHouse connection.
73-76: Function Implementation ApprovedThe
Shutdownfunction correctly handles the cleanup of resources, ensuring both the batch processor and the ClickHouse connection are closed.
78-80: Function Implementation ApprovedThe
InsertApiRequestfunction correctly buffers API requests for batch processing, utilizing the established infrastructure effectively.deployment/docker-compose.yaml (3)
74-88: Service Configuration ApprovedThe ClickHouse service is correctly configured with appropriate settings for image, user permissions, container name, hostname, ports, and volume mappings. The dependency on
clickhouse-keeperis also correctly established.
58-60: Environment Variable Configuration ApprovedThe new environment variables for ClickHouse (
CLICKHOUSE_ADDR,CLICKHOUSE_USERNAME,CLICKHOUSE_PASSWORD) are correctly defined and essential for configuring the database connection.
89-96: Service Configuration ApprovedThe ClickHouse Keeper service is correctly configured with appropriate settings for image, user permissions, container name, hostname, ports, and volume mappings.
apps/agent/pkg/api/server.go (3)
17-17: Approved import addition for UID generation.The addition of the
uidpackage is necessary for generating unique request IDs, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance request tracking.
41-44: Approved addition of ClickHouse configuration fields inConfigstruct.The new fields in the
Configstruct allow for external configuration of the ClickHouse integration, enhancing flexibility and functionality.
61-61: Approved modifications inNewfunction for ClickHouse integration and request tracking.The changes in the
Newfunction properly initialize theclickhousefield and add middleware for generating and appending a unique request ID. Consider adding error handling for theuid.Newfunction to ensure robustness.Also applies to: 69-70, 72-72
apps/agent/go.mod (10)
8-8: Verify the necessity and compatibility of ClickHouse dependencies.The addition of
github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-go/v2 v2.28.1suggests significant integration with ClickHouse. Ensure that this library version is compatible with other project dependencies and that it is necessary for the project's requirements.
46-46: Review the indirect dependency on ClickHouse.The dependency
github.com/ClickHouse/ch-go v0.62.0is marked as indirect. Verify whether this dependency is essential or if it can be removed to simplify the dependency graph.
51-51: Assess the addition of the brotli compression library.
github.com/andybalholm/brotli v1.1.0has been added as an indirect dependency. Confirm its usage within the project, particularly if it's being used for data compression in network communications or file storage.
106-106: Evaluate the inclusion of city hash library.
github.com/go-faster/city v1.0.1is added as an indirect dependency. This library is typically used for fast hashing functions. Ensure that its performance benefits are leveraged appropriately in the project.
107-107: Check the new error handling library.The addition of
github.com/go-faster/errors v0.7.1suggests an enhancement in error handling. Review the project's current error handling strategy to ensure compatibility and improvement.
114-114: Confirm the necessity of the MySQL driver.
github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.4.0is added as an indirect dependency. If the project is integrating with MySQL databases alongside ClickHouse, confirm that this driver is required and correctly configured.
186-186: Review the addition of the orb library for geospatial data.
github.com/paulmach/orb v0.11.1has been added as an indirect dependency. This library is used for handling geospatial data structures and algorithms. Verify its use case within the project, especially if geospatial data is a part of the data handling or visualization features.
188-188: Assess the inclusion of the LZ4 compression library.
github.com/pierrec/lz4/v4 v4.1.21is added as an indirect dependency. This library is known for its high-speed data compression. Confirm its integration and performance impact, particularly in scenarios involving large data volumes.
201-201: Evaluate the addition of the assembly optimizations library.
github.com/segmentio/asm v1.2.0is added as an indirect dependency. This library provides assembly optimizations. Review the specific areas of the application that benefit from these optimizations to ensure they are effectively utilized.
206-206: Check the decimal handling library.
github.com/shopspring/decimal v1.4.0is added as an indirect dependency. This library is crucial for precise decimal calculations. Ensure that it is used appropriately in financial or other precision-critical calculations within the project.apps/agent/cmd/agent/agent.go (1)
137-148: Clarify the use ofNoopIngesterand verify error handling.The integration of Clickhouse in the
runfunction uses aNoopIngesterby default, which is replaced if a Clickhouse configuration is provided. Consider adding comments to clarify the purpose of using aNoopIngesteras the default. Additionally, ensure that all error paths are adequately tested to handle potential runtime issues effectively.ch := clickhouse.NewNoopIngester() // Default NoopIngester used when no Clickhouse configuration is provided if cfg.Clickhouse != nil { ch, err = clickhouse.New(clickhouse.Config{ Addr: cfg.Clickhouse.Addr, Username: cfg.Clickhouse.Username, Password: cfg.Clickhouse.Password, Logger: logger.With().Str("pkg", "clickhouse").Logger(), }) if err != nil { return err // Ensure this error is properly logged and handled } }
feat(agent): add new context utility functions for request ID handling feat(agent): implement error handling functions for validation and unhandled errors feat(agent): refactor logging middleware to capture request details and log fix(api): refactor middleware to use http.ResponseWriter instead of fiber.Ctx feat(api): add support for request ID middleware feat(api): add tracing middleware for http requests feat(api): add not found route handler feat(api): add sender interface and JSON sender implementation feat(api): update route handling to use http.ServeMux instead of fiber.App fix(handler.go): change fiber.Ctx to http.ResponseWriter and http.Request fix(handler.go): update error handling for validation and encryption errors fix(handler.go): update response handling to use http.ResponseWriter and context refactor(server.go): replace fiber framework with standard net/http package feat(server.go): implement custom server struct with http.ServeMux and http.Server feat(server.go): add support for custom error handling and timeouts feat(server.go): update server initialization to use custom server struct feat(server.go): refactor route handling to use http.ServeMux instead of fiber feat(server.go): update server Listen and Shutdown methods to use http.Server refactor(harness.go): replace fiber framework with standard net/http package feat(harness.go): implement custom Harness struct with http.ServeMux feat(harness.go): update Register method to use http.ServeMux instead of fiber feat(harness.go): update CallRoute function to use http.ServeMux refactor(validator.go): remove dependency on fiber framework feat(validator.go): implement custom Body method for request validation chore(openapi): optimize required fields formatting in openapi.json feat(openapi): add new request prefix constant in uid.go feat(schema): simplify required fields formatting in schema.json fix(eventrouter): change fiber.Handler to http.HandlerFunc for CreateHandler fix(eventrouter): update request and response handling in CreateHandler fix(eventrouter): update error handling and response status codes in CreateHandler fix(eventrouter): update handling of query parameters in CreateHandler fix(eventrouter): update handling of request body and response in CreateHandler fix(v1_keys_verifyKey.multilimit.test.ts): add missing semicolon to console.info
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (9)
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_liveness/handler_test.go (1)
18-18: Consider adding assertions to verify the response body content.The liveness endpoint returns a JSON body with a message "OK" in addition to the 200 status code. While the current test checks the status code, it would be beneficial to also assert the response body to ensure comprehensive validation of the endpoint's behavior.
- Add assertions to verify that the response body contains the expected JSON structure and message.
Analysis chain
Verify the sufficiency of the simplified assertion checks.
The assertion checks have been simplified to verify only the response status code, while the previous JSON body check has been removed.
Please ensure that the simplified assertion checks are sufficient for validating the correctness of the liveness endpoint response. If necessary, consider adding more comprehensive assertions to verify the response content or structure.
Run the following script to search for potential usages of the liveness endpoint:
Review the search results to determine if additional assertions are needed based on how the liveness endpoint is being used in the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usages of the liveness endpoint. # Test: Search for usages of the liveness endpoint. Expect: Only valid usages. rg --type go -g '!*_test.go' $'/v1/liveness'Length of output: 345
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the liveness endpoint handler to understand its response. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func $_($_, $_) { $$$ }' apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_liveness/handler.goLength of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for function definitions in the handler.go file to locate the liveness endpoint handler implementation. rg 'func ' apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_liveness/handler.go -A 10Length of output: 369
apps/agent/cmd/main.go (1)
29-36: LGTM! Consider extracting the formatting logic into a separate function.The code changes are correctly implemented and achieve the desired output formatting. The changes improve the readability and clarity of the output by providing a structured format that distinguishes between the location and the message associated with each element in the
chain.To further improve the code, consider extracting the formatting logic into a separate function for better modularity and reusability. Here's an example:
func formatChain(chain []fault.Fault) string { var output string for _, e := range chain { output += " - " if e.Location != "" { output += fmt.Sprintf("%s\n", e.Location) output += " > " } output += fmt.Sprintf("%s\n", e.Message) } return output }Then, you can replace the loop in the
mainfunction with:fmt.Println(formatChain(chain))This refactoring makes the code more modular and reusable, as the formatting logic can be easily reused in other parts of the codebase if needed.
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/route.go (1)
22-22: Fix the typo in the type name.The type name
Middewarehas a typo. It should beMiddleware.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-type Middeware func(http.HandlerFunc) http.HandlerFunc +type Middleware func(http.HandlerFunc) http.HandlerFuncapps/agent/pkg/api/errors/validation.go (1)
12-32: LGTM with a minor suggestion!The code changes are approved. The function is correctly implemented and follows the OpenAPI specification. It uses the
fmsgpackage to get the issues from the error and thectxutilpackage to get the request ID from the context, which are good practices for error handling, logging, and tracing. It also returns anopenapi.ErrorModelwith a status code of 500, which is a good practice for internal server errors.However, please consider replacing the TODO comments with actual values for the instance URL and the type.
- Instance: "https://errors.unkey.com/todo", + Instance: "https://errors.unkey.com/internal-server-error", - Type: "TODO docs link", + Type: "https://docs.unkey.com/errors/internal-server-error",apps/agent/config.local.json (3)
5-8: Use strong, unique credentials for thepprofsection.Using default credentials is not recommended. Please consider using strong, unique credentials for the
usernameandpasswordproperties.{ "pprof": { "username": "<strong_unique_username>", "password": "<strong_unique_password>" } }
11-20: Improve theclusterconfiguration section.Please consider the following suggestions:
- Use a strong, unique token for the
authTokenproperty.- Use environment variables for the
authTokenandjoinproperties to make the configuration more flexible.{ "cluster": { "authToken": "<strong_unique_token>", "serfAddr": "localhost:9090", "rpcAddr": "localhost:9095", "join": { "env": { "addrs": ["${UNKEY_AGENT_JOIN_ADDR}"] } } } }
21-34: Improve theservicesconfiguration section.Please consider the following suggestions:
- Use strong, unique tokens for the
authTokenproperties in theratelimitandeventRoutersections.- Use a valid token for the
tokenproperty in thetinybirdsection.- Use environment variables for the
authTokenandtokenproperties to make the configuration more flexible.{ "services": { "ratelimit": { "authToken": "<strong_unique_token>" }, "eventRouter": { "authToken": "<strong_unique_token>", "tinybird": { "token": "${TINYBIRD_TOKEN}", "batchSize": 1000, "flushInterval": 1, "bufferSize": 10000 } } } }apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_metrics.go (1)
36-52: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Consider capturing additional metrics such as request size, response size, etc. to gain more insights into the API performance.
For example, you can capture the request size using
r.ContentLengthand the response size usingwi.bytesWritten(you'll need to add a new field toresponseWriterStatusInterceptorto capture the bytes written).Then, you can expose these metrics using Prometheus:
prometheus.HTTPRequestSize.WithLabelValues(r.URL.Path).Observe(float64(r.ContentLength)) prometheus.HTTPResponseSize.WithLabelValues(r.URL.Path).Observe(float64(wi.bytesWritten))apps/agent/pkg/api/register_routes.go (1)
15-54: Suggestions for improving theRegisterRoutesmethod:
Consider moving the
Servicesstruct to a separate file for better organization and reusability.Create the
staticBearerAuthmiddleware once and reuse it for all routes that require authentication. This will reduce duplication and improve maintainability.Refactor the route registration code to reduce duplication and improve readability. For example, you could create a helper function that takes a route and middleware and registers them with the mux.
Here's an example of how you could refactor the route registration code:
func registerRoute(mux *http.ServeMux, route routes.Route, middleware ...func(http.Handler) http.Handler) { handler := route.Handler() for _, mw := range middleware { handler = mw(handler) } mux.Handle(route.Path(), handler) } func (s *Server) RegisterRoutes() { // ... registerRoute(s.mux, v1Liveness.New(svc)) registerRoute(s.mux, v1RatelimitCommitLease.New(svc), staticBearerAuth) registerRoute(s.mux, v1RatelimitMultiRatelimit.New(svc), staticBearerAuth) registerRoute(s.mux, v1RatelimitRatelimit.New(svc), staticBearerAuth) registerRoute(s.mux, v1VaultDecrypt.New(svc), staticBearerAuth) registerRoute(s.mux, v1VaultEncrypt.New(svc), staticBearerAuth) registerRoute(s.mux, v1VaultEncryptBulk.New(svc), staticBearerAuth) registerRoute(s.mux, notFound.New(svc)) }This refactoring makes the route registration more concise and easier to read while still allowing for flexibility in applying middleware to specific routes.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
apps/agent/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (47)
- apps/agent/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/Taskfile.yml (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/cmd/agent/agent.go (4 hunks)
- apps/agent/cmd/main.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/config.local.json (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/gen/openapi/gen.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/go.mod (11 hunks)
- apps/agent/integration/cluster/docker/ratelimits_test.go (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/agent_auth.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/ctxutil/context.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/unhandled.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/validation.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/interface.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_logging.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_metrics.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_request_id.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_tracing.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/register_routes.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/not_found/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/route.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/sender.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/services.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_liveness/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_liveness/handler_test.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler_test.go (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_multiRatelimit/handler.go (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_ratelimit/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_ratelimit/handler_test.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_decrypt/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt_bulk/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/server.go (4 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/testutil/harness.go (5 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/validation/validator.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/client.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/interface.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/noop.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/001_create_requests_table.sql (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/requests.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/openapi/config.yaml (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/openapi/openapi.json (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/tinybird/tinybird.go (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/uid/uid.go (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/schema.json (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/services/eventrouter/service.go (3 hunks)
- apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.multilimit.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- apps/agent/gen/openapi/gen.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/001_create_requests_table.sql
- apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.multilimit.test.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- apps/agent/cmd/agent/agent.go
- apps/agent/go.mod
- apps/agent/pkg/api/interface.go
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/services.go
- apps/agent/pkg/api/server.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/client.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/noop.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/requests.go
Additional context used
checkov
apps/agent/pkg/openapi/openapi.json
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
Additional comments not posted (92)
apps/agent/pkg/openapi/config.yaml (1)
1-6: LGTM!The OpenAPI configuration looks good:
- The
packageis correctly set toopenapi.- The
outputis correctly set to./gen/openapi/gen.go.- The
generatesection correctly enables generating models.- The
output-optionssection correctly enables nullable types.apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/interface.go (1)
7-9: LGTM!The
Buffererinterface is correctly defined:
- The interface name follows Go naming conventions.
- The
BufferApiRequestmethod signature is clear and uses a type from the importedschemapackage.- The interface has a clear and focused responsibility.
apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_tracing.go (1)
1-18: LGTM!The
withTracingmiddleware function is well-implemented and follows best practices for tracing in Go:
- It wraps the next handler using
http.HandlerFuncto create a middleware function.- It starts a new span using
tracing.Startand defers the span'sEndmethod to ensure proper tracing.- It updates the request context with the new context containing the span before calling the next handler.
The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_request_id.go (1)
10-16: LGTM!The middleware function
withRequestIdis correctly implemented and follows the standard middleware pattern. It uses theuidpackage to generate a unique request ID and thectxutilpackage to set the request ID in the context.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_liveness/handler.go (4)
1-1: LGTM!The package declaration and imports have been updated to reflect the restructuring of the liveness check functionality.
Also applies to: 4-4, 6-8
10-21: LGTM!The
Newfunction simplifies the endpoint registration process and improves the response handling by:
- Creating a new route for the liveness check using
routes.NewRoute.- Utilizing the
http.ResponseWriterandhttp.Requesttypes in the route handler.- Sending the response using
svc.Sender.Sendwith theopenapi.V1LivenessResponseBodystructure.
14-14: LGTM!The log message is appropriate for debugging purposes.
16-18: LGTM!The response body is appropriate for a liveness check.
apps/agent/pkg/uid/uid.go (2)
12-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_liveness/handler_test.go (3)
1-1: LGTM: The package name change aligns with the API versioning and is more descriptive.The package name has been changed from
handler_testtov1Liveness_test, which aligns with the versioning of the API and provides a more descriptive naming convention.
14-16: LGTM: The test function implementation changes enhance modularity and reusability.The test function implementation has undergone a significant overhaul:
- The test now uses
testutil.NewHarnessfor setup, which indicates a more modular approach to testing.- The route is set up using
h.SetupRoute(v1Liveness.New), which encapsulates the route registration process more effectively.- The route is invoked using
testutil.CallRoute, which provides a generic and reusable way to handle route calls in tests.These changes enhance the clarity, maintainability, and robustness of the test code.
7-9: Verify the impact of the import statement changes.The import statements have been modified to remove the
humatestpackage and include a newtestutilpackage. This change suggests a shift in the testing framework or methodology being employed.Please ensure that the removal of the
humatestpackage and the inclusion of the newtestutilpackage do not introduce any breaking changes or inconsistencies in the test suite.Run the following script to search for potential usages of the removed and added packages:
Verification successful
Transition from
humatesttotestutilverified successfully.The
testutilpackage is actively used in test files, replacing thehumatestpackage. Functions likeNewHarnessandCallRouteare utilized, indicating thattestutilis fulfilling the necessary testing roles without introducing breaking changes. No occurrences ofhumatestwere found in non-test files, confirming its removal.
- The transition from
humatesttotestutilis complete and consistent across the test suite.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usages of the removed and added packages. # Test 1: Search for usages of the removed `humatest` package. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -g '!*_test.go' $'humatest' # Test 2: Search for usages of the added `testutil` package. Expect: Only valid usages. rg --type go -g '!*_test.go' $'testutil'Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of the `testutil` package in test files to verify its correct usage. # Test 3: Search for usages of the `testutil` package in test files. rg --type go -g '*_test.go' $'testutil'Length of output: 2169
apps/agent/pkg/api/ctxutil/context.go (5)
1-3: LGTM!The package declaration and import statements are approved.
5-7: LGTM!The constant declaration is approved.
9-17: LGTM!The
getValuefunction is well-implemented and documented.
19-21: LGTM!The
GetRequestIdfunction is well-implemented.
23-25: LGTM!The
SetRequestIdfunction is well-implemented.apps/agent/Dockerfile (1)
19-19: LGTM!The code change is approved. It correctly copies the
openapi.jsonfile from the builder stage to the final image, which is beneficial for including the OpenAPI specification in the Docker image.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/route.go (5)
8-12: LGTM!The
Routestruct is well-defined with appropriately named fields.
14-20: LGTM!The
NewRoutefunction is a correctly implemented constructor for creating a newRouteinstance.
24-29: LGTM!The
WithMiddlewaremethod is correctly implemented to apply middleware to the route's handler.
31-33: LGTM!The
Registermethod is correctly implemented to register the route with the providedhttp.ServeMux.
35-37: LGTM!The
MethodandPathgetter methods are correctly implemented.Also applies to: 39-41
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/not_found/handler.go (2)
1-9: LGTM!The package declaration and imports are correctly implemented and follow Go conventions.
12-27: LGTM!The
Newfunction is correctly implemented and follows Go conventions. It returns a 404 response with an error model containing relevant details.Some good practices observed:
- The function uses the
ctxutil.GetRequestIdfunction to get the request ID from the context, which is useful for logging and tracing.- The function uses the
svc.Sender.Sendmethod to send the response, which separates concerns.apps/agent/config.local.json (2)
1-10: LGTM!The top-level configuration properties are correctly defined.
35-38: LGTM!The
prometheusconfiguration section is correctly defined.apps/agent/Taskfile.yml (2)
28-30: The existing comment suggesting to add comments or documentation for the newmigratetask is still valid and applicable.
32-38: LGTM!The new
generatetask looks good and enhances the code generation capabilities.apps/agent/pkg/api/agent_auth.go (5)
8-8: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
14-39: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The changes enhance the clarity and functionality of the middleware, aligning it more closely with standard HTTP practices while improving error handling.
32-36: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
38-38: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt/handler.go (2)
1-1: LGTM!The package name change and updated imports align with the restructuring of the code to use OpenAPI types and improve error handling.
Also applies to: 4-4, 6-8
12-35: LGTM!The
Newfunction streamlines the request handling process and aligns the implementation with OpenAPI standards. The error handling has been improved using dedicated error handling functions.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_decrypt/handler.go (4)
14-15: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
16-21: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
23-27: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_metrics.go (1)
15-34: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt_bulk/handler.go (5)
4-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
14-15: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
17-25: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
27-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
35-43: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/tinybird/tinybird.go (1)
Line range hint
56-67: LGTM!The code changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The change leverages a predefined response structure from the OpenAPI specification, which improves consistency and integration with other components.
- The change simplifies the response handling logic by using a standardized structure.
- The change correctly checks if all rows were ingested by comparing the
SuccessfulRowsfield with the length of therowsslice.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler.go (2)
16-48: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function is well-structured, modular, and follows best practices for request validation, error handling, and response sending.
22-26: Verify the error handling.The function uses the
errors.HandleValidationErroranderrors.HandleErrorfunctions to handle errors. This ensures that the errors are handled consistently and logged appropriately.Run the following script to verify the error handling:
Also applies to: 31-34, 40-44
Verification successful
Error Handling Verified
The error handling in
v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler.gois correctly implemented usingerrors.HandleValidationErroranderrors.HandleErrorfor handling validation and other errors, respectively. This ensures consistent error handling and logging across the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in the `New` function. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `errors.HandleValidationError`. Expect: The function to be used for handling validation errors. rg --type go -A 5 $'errors.HandleValidationError' # Test 2: Search for the usage of `errors.HandleError`. Expect: The function to be used for handling other errors. rg --type go -A 5 $'errors.HandleError'Length of output: 7260
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_multiRatelimit/handler.go (5)
12-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The introduction of the
Newfunction to construct a new route simplifies the route registration process.
15-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The use of
svc.OpenApiValidator.Bodyfor request body validation and the dedicated error handling functionerrors.HandleValidationErrorfor validation errors improve the code quality and maintainability.
23-26: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The adjustment to the handling of the cost parameter to ensure a default value of 1 is used if not provided prevents potential issues related to uninitialized or nil cost values.
34-38: Verify the emptyratelimitv1.RatelimitMultiRequestparameter.Please ensure that passing an empty
ratelimitv1.RatelimitMultiRequestto thesvc.Ratelimit.MultiRatelimitfunction is intentional and not an oversight.
52-52: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The use of
svc.Sender.Sendto directly send the response simplifies the response handling and reduces the overhead of constructing response objects.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler_test.go (5)
1-1: LGTM!The package name change to
v1RatelimitCommitLease_testprovides a more specific context for the tests.
19-20: LGTM!The changes to the test function
TestCommitLeaseenhance the clarity and maintainability of the test code by using a more modular and standardized approach to setting up routes withh.SetupRoute.
22-31: LGTM!The changes to the request construction, shifting from
v1RatelimitRatelimit.V1RatelimitRatelimitRequesttoopenapi.V1RatelimitRatelimitRequestBody, suggest a move towards a more standardized API definition, aligning the test with the open API specifications.
34-41: LGTM!The changes to the response handling and assertions enhance the flexibility, readability, and maintainability of the test code by:
- Utilizing a generic
testutil.CallRoutefunction for response handling.- Streamlining assertions with direct comparisons to the response body properties.
43-47: LGTM!The changes to the commit request construction, updating it to use
openapi.V1RatelimitCommitLeaseRequestBody, align the test code with the open API specifications, enhancing the consistency and maintainability of the test code.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_ratelimit/handler_test.go (2)
15-30: LGTM!The changes to the
TestRatelimitfunction improve the clarity and structure of the test case by leveraging theopenapitypes for request and response structures. The test case is correctly verifying the expected rate limiting behavior.
32-55: Verify the reason for skipping the test case.The changes to the
TestRatelimitWithLeasefunction improve the clarity and structure of the test case by leveraging theopenapitypes for request and response structures. The test case is correctly verifying the expected rate limiting behavior with a lease.The test case is currently skipped. Please verify the reason for skipping the test case. If the lease functionality is not fully implemented or requires further testing, consider removing the
t.Skip()call and updating the test case accordingly.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_ratelimit/handler.go (5)
15-15: LGTM!The refactoring of the function to focus on creating a new route without registering it is a good change. It separates the concerns and improves the modularity of the code.
20-23: LGTM!The usage of
OpenApiValidatorfor request validation anderrors.HandleValidationErrorfor handling validation errors is a good improvement. It makes the code more robust and maintainable.
26-28: LGTM!Setting a default value of 1 for the
Costfield if it is not provided in the request is a good practice. It ensures that the field always has a valid value and improves the reliability of the code.
31-36: LGTM!The handling of the optional
Leasefield in the request is implemented correctly. If the field is provided, aLeaseRequestobject is created with theCostandTimeoutfields copied from the request. This ensures that theLeasefield is processed correctly.
50-56: LGTM!The creation of the
V1RatelimitRatelimitResponseBodyobject and populating its fields from theRatelimitResponseobject is implemented correctly. This ensures that the correct response is sent back to the client.apps/agent/pkg/api/validation/validator.go (3)
18-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
22-43: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
45-68: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/sender.go (4)
13-18: LGTM!The
Senderinterface is well-defined with a clear method signature.
20-22: LGTM!The
JsonSenderstruct is well-defined with an appropriately named field.
24-26: LGTM!The
NewJsonSenderfunction is well-defined and follows the factory pattern.
30-65: LGTM!The
Sendmethod is well-defined and handles the response body marshalling and error handling appropriately.apps/agent/pkg/api/register_routes.go (1)
1-13: LGTM!The package declaration and imports follow Go conventions and seem appropriate for the file's purpose.
apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_logging.go (1)
17-38: LGTM!The
responseWriterInterceptorstruct is correctly implemented and captures the necessary information for logging.apps/agent/pkg/api/testutil/harness.go (5)
30-30: LGTM!The change in the
Harnessstruct, replacing theapifield with amuxfield of type*http.ServeMux, aligns with the overall modifications in the file to enhance route management and testing using the HTTP multiplexer.
34-34: LGTM!The update to the
NewHarnessfunction, initializing themuxfield instead of theapifield, aligns with the change in theHarnessstruct and ensures proper setup of theHarnesswith an HTTP multiplexer for route management and testing.
75-79: LGTM!The changes to the
Registermethod, accepting a*routes.Routeparameter and registering it with the multiplexer usingroute.Register(h.mux), simplify the route registration process and align with the overall shift towards using the HTTP multiplexer for route management.
81-89: LGTM!The addition of the
SetupRoutemethod enhances the flexibility of route setup within the harness by allowing the construction of a*routes.Routeusing a provided constructor function and the existing services. It ensures that the route is properly set up and registered with the multiplexer using theRegistermethod.
107-133: LGTM!The addition of the
CallRoutefunction is a valuable enhancement that simplifies the process of making HTTP requests to registered routes for testing purposes. It handles the setup, registration, and request/response cycle, and returns aTestResponsestruct encapsulating the response details, making it convenient to inspect and assert the response in tests.apps/agent/services/eventrouter/service.go (1)
Line range hint
85-149: LGTM!The changes to the
CreateHandlerfunction are approved for the following reasons:
- The function signature change improves clarity by directly returning a function that processes HTTP requests.
- Explicitly defining the HTTP method and path improves documentation and understanding of the API's expected behavior.
- The error handling changes standardize the response format and allow for more control over the response body.
- The response structure change indicates a shift towards a more structured and standardized response format, which may enhance compatibility with other components.
apps/agent/integration/cluster/docker/ratelimits_test.go (4)
13-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
91-95: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
119-120: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
126-130: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/schema.json (3)
8-24: LGTM!The new
clickhouseobject in the schema correctly defines the required properties for ClickHouse connection details with appropriate types and constraints.
177-194: LGTM!The new
prometheusobject in the schema correctly defines the required properties for Prometheus metrics scraping with appropriate types, descriptions, and default values.
218-222: LGTM!The new
rpcPortproperty in the schema correctly defines the port for listening to RPC requests with an appropriate type, description, and default value.apps/agent/pkg/openapi/openapi.json (3)
1-786: The OpenAPI specification looks good!The specification is comprehensive and well-structured. It clearly defines the API contract including:
- Schemas for request and response bodies
- Paths defining the API endpoints
- Servers defining the base URLs
No major issues found. The specification is approved.
Tools
checkov
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
1-786: Ignore static analysis hint about global security field.The static analysis hint suggests defining rules in the global security field. However, the global security field is not mandatory in OpenAPI specifications.
Defining security at the operation level, as this specification seems to be doing, is an acceptable alternative.
Therefore, this hint is likely a false positive and can be ignored.
Tools
checkov
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
1-786: Verify if the lack of security definitions is intended.The static analysis hint suggests ensuring security operations are defined. However, this specification does not include any security definitions at the operation level.
Please verify if this is intended. If the API is meant to be public and not require any authentication or authorization, then the lack of security definitions is acceptable.
However, if the API does require security, then the security definitions should be added.
If security definitions are needed, I can assist in adding them to the specification. Please let me know if you would like me to do that or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
Tools
checkov
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-786: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/internal_server_error.go (1)
13-13: Consider renaming the function to better reflect its purpose.The function name
HandleErroris a bit generic. Consider renaming it to something more specific likeHandleInternalServerErrorto better reflect its purpose.Apply this diff to rename the function:
-func HandleError(ctx context.Context, err error) openapi.BaseError { +func HandleInternalServerError(ctx context.Context, err error) openapi.BaseError {apps/agent/config.docker.json (1)
9-9: TheauthTokenparameter is still in use in the codebase.The
authTokenis present in several Go files and is used in various services and components, indicating that it remains an integral part of the authentication mechanism. The removal from the JSON configuration file suggests a change in how the token is provided or managed, but it does not eliminate its usage. Verify how theauthTokenis now being managed or set in the application.
- Files with
authTokenusage:
apps/agent/services/eventrouter/service.goapps/agent/pkg/connect/ratelimit.goapps/agent/pkg/config/agent.goapps/agent/pkg/cluster/cluster.goapps/agent/pkg/auth/authorization.goapps/agent/pkg/api/server.goAnalysis chain
Verify the impact of removing the
authTokenparameter on the authentication mechanism.The
authTokenparameter has been removed from multiple places in the configuration, including the root level and theratelimitandeventRouterservices. This suggests a significant change in the authentication mechanism.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
authTokenparameter in the codebase:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `authToken` parameter in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `authToken` parameter. Expect: No occurrences or only occurrences in the new authentication mechanism. rg --type go $'authToken'Length of output: 2063
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
apps/agent/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (30)
- Taskfile.yml (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/cmd/agent/agent.go (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/config.docker.json (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/config.production.json (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/config.staging.json (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/gen/openapi/gen.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/go.mod (10 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/internal_server_error.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/validation_error.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_logging.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/register_routes.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/not_found/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/sender.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_multiRatelimit/handler.go (2 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_ratelimit/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_decrypt/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt_bulk/handler.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/server.go (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/validation/validator.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/client.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/flush.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/noop.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/001_create_requests_table.sql (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/requests.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/config/agent.go (3 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/openapi/openapi.json (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/schema.json (6 hunks)
- deployment/docker-compose.yaml (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- apps/agent/cmd/agent/agent.go
- apps/agent/gen/openapi/gen.go
- apps/agent/go.mod
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_logging.go
- apps/agent/pkg/api/register_routes.go
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/not_found/handler.go
- apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/sender.go
- apps/agent/pkg/api/validation/validator.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/client.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/flush.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/noop.go
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/001_create_requests_table.sql
- apps/agent/pkg/clickhouse/schema/requests.go
- deployment/docker-compose.yaml
Additional context used
checkov
apps/agent/pkg/openapi/openapi.json
[HIGH] 1-898: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-898: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
Additional comments not posted (48)
Taskfile.yml (2)
22-28: LGTM!The
migrate-clickhousetask is correctly defined with the required environment variables and command.
Line range hint
31-35: LGTM!The
migrate-dbtask is correctly defined with the required environment variable and command.apps/agent/config.docker.json (2)
36-36: LGTM!Using an environment variable for the
masterKeysparameter is a good practice for security and configuration management.
42-44: LGTM!The addition of the
clickhouseconfiguration section with theurlparameter set to an environment variable is a good practice for integrating ClickHouse database into the application.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt/handler.go (4)
1-1: LGTM!The changes to the package name and imports align with the restructuring of the code to use a more standardized API structure and improve error handling.
Also applies to: 4-4, 6-6, 8-8
12-35: LGTM!The
Newfunction streamlines the request handling process and aligns the implementation more closely with OpenAPI standards, while also improving error handling mechanisms.
17-21: LGTM!The error handling changes improve the clarity and maintainability of error responses.
31-34: LGTM!The response handling changes align the implementation more closely with OpenAPI standards.
apps/agent/config.staging.json (2)
13-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved for the following reasons:
- Adding the
"authToken"field at the root level is a good change as it centralizes the definition of the authentication token.- Using an environment variable for the value of the
"authToken"field is a good practice as it keeps the sensitive information out of the configuration file.
28-28: LGTM!The code changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The removal of the
"authToken"field from the"vault"section is consistent with the addition of the"authToken"field at the root level.- The
"vault"section no longer needs the"authToken"field as it can access the value from the root level.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_decrypt/handler.go (1)
14-35: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function is well-structured and follows a clear flow of validating the request, processing the request, and sending the response. The use of
http.ResponseWriterandhttp.Requesttypes directly allows for a more conventional HTTP handler pattern, which is a good practice. The request body validation usingsvc.OpenApiValidator.Bodyis a good practice as it ensures that the request body is valid before processing the request. The error handling using a custom error handler (errors.HandleError) is a good practice as it wraps the error with additional context, which can be useful for debugging and logging. The response handling usingsvc.Sender.Sendis a good practice as it simplifies the response handling by directly sending the plaintext result without the need for an intermediate response struct.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_vault_encrypt_bulk/handler.go (5)
4-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
14-16: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
17-25: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
27-32: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
35-43: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_commitLease/handler.go (3)
1-1: Skipping the previous comment on theRedactmethod.The
Redactmethod and the associated request and response structs have been removed in the current changes, making the previous comment no longer applicable.
1-1: Skipping the previous comment on theInsertApiRequestcall.The
InsertApiRequestcall is not present in the current changes, making the previous comment no longer applicable.
16-48: LGTM!The code changes in the
Newfunction look good. The changes improve the request handling, validation, and error management. The lease decoding and unmarshaling logic is correctly implemented. TheCommitLeaseRPC is called with the appropriate parameters. The response sending logic is also correctly implemented.apps/agent/config.production.json (2)
13-13: LGTM!The addition of the
authTokenproperty at the root level is a good approach to centralize the management of authentication tokens. Using an environment variable for the token value is also a secure practice.
46-46: LGTM!Setting the
masterKeysvalue using an environment variable is a secure practice and aligns with the overall approach of using environment variables for sensitive configuration values.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_multiRatelimit/handler.go (5)
12-13: LGTM!The change from
RegistertoNewfunction is approved. It simplifies the API endpoint registration by moving to a more direct HTTP handler approach.
18-22: LGTM!The change to use
svc.OpenApiValidator.Bodyfor request body validation andsvc.Sender.Sendfor sending error response is approved. It enhances error handling for validation errors.
25-28: Verify the change in logic for handling the cost parameter.Ensure that using a default cost value of 1, when not provided in the request, is the intended behavior.
36-41: Verify the empty request and the error handling change.
Ensure that passing an empty request to
svc.Ratelimit.MultiRatelimitis the intended behavior.The change to use
errors.HandleErrorfor error handling is approved. It simplifies the error handling.
53-53: LGTM!The change to use
svc.Sender.Sendfor sending the response is approved. It simplifies the response handling.apps/agent/pkg/api/routes/v1_ratelimit_ratelimit/handler.go (6)
15-15: LGTM!The function signature changes are consistent with the other route handlers in the codebase.
19-23: LGTM!The request validation changes are approved:
- The OpenAPI generated structure and validator improve the request validation process.
- The error handling has been updated to use a dedicated error management function, which is a good practice.
26-28: LGTM!Setting a default value for the cost parameter is a good practice to ensure a consistent behavior.
31-36: LGTM!The lease handling changes simplify the code and improve readability.
50-56: LGTM!The response construction changes simplify the code and improve readability.
58-65: LGTM!The lease response handling changes are approved:
- The changes are consistent with the other response handling changes.
- The error handling has been updated to use a dedicated error management function, which is a good practice.
apps/agent/pkg/api/server.go (7)
8-8: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
26-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
34-40: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
43-94: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
101-103: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
116-118: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
127-127: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/agent/pkg/config/agent.go (4)
7-7: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
40-46: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
53-53: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
80-82: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The past review comment suggesting the addition of validation constraints to the
UsernameandPasswordfields is not applicable to the current code segment as these fields are not present.apps/agent/schema.json (4)
8-12: LGTM!The
authTokenproperty is correctly defined with appropriate type, description, and constraints.
13-29: LGTM!The
clickhouseobject is correctly defined with appropriate properties and constraints.
167-183: LGTM!The
prometheusobject is correctly defined with appropriate properties, types, and default values.
208-212: LGTM!The
rpcPortproperty is correctly defined with an appropriate type, description, and default value.apps/agent/pkg/openapi/openapi.json (1)
1-898: The file is a valid OpenAPI specification.The file follows the OpenAPI 3.0 specification and defines various schemas, paths, and operations for an API. The structure and syntax of the file are correct.
Tools
checkov
[HIGH] 1-898: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-898: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/internal_server_error.go (1 hunks)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/validation_error.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/internal_server_error.go
- apps/agent/pkg/api/errors/validation_error.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_metrics.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/agent/pkg/api/mw_metrics.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_createKey.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_createKey.ts
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
migrate-clickhousetask for database migrations.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores