-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improving gesture using interactjs #469
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for dazzling-kringle-090742 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe changes flutter through the codebase, refining zoom interactions, enhancing element visibility, and adjusting expectations for a smoother user experience during zoom toggling. Changes
Poem
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Files selected for processing (16)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (15)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for terminal7 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
css/terminal7.css (1)
211-211
: Review the increased padding in#navbar
.The padding for
#navbar
has been increased. While this is a minor change, it's important to check that it does not disrupt the layout or the user's interaction experience, especially on smaller screens.
src/terminal7.ts
Outdated
// search box | ||
document.querySelector(".search-close").addEventListener('click', () => { | ||
this.map.showLog(false) | ||
this.activeG.activeW.activeP.exitSearch() | ||
this.activeG.activeW.activeP.focus() | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider using event delegation for search-related event listeners to reduce the number of listeners and improve performance.
// TODO: add onMap to props | ||
addGate(props, onMap = true) { | ||
const container = document.getElementById('gates-container') | ||
const p = props || {} | ||
// add the id | ||
p.id = p.fp || p.name | ||
const g = new Gate(p) | ||
g.onlySSH = p.onlySSH | ||
this.gates.push(g) | ||
g.open(this.e) | ||
g.open(container) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment // TODO: add onMap to props
suggests an incomplete feature or enhancement. Consider addressing this or creating a tracking issue if it's not going to be resolved in this PR.
Would you like me to open a GitHub issue to track the completion of this TODO item?
const gatesContainer = document.getElementById('gates-container') | ||
gatesContainer.classList.add('hidden') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The manipulation of class attributes directly in multiple places can lead to inconsistencies. Consider creating a utility function to handle UI state changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
const gatesContainer = document.getElementById('gates-container') | ||
gatesContainer.classList.remove('hidden') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider refactoring the direct DOM manipulations in the focus
method to a separate UI handling method. This would improve maintainability and encapsulation, making the code easier to manage and test.
// the pane is in transition - ignore resize events | ||
transit = false | ||
draggedDivider = null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The addition of transit
and draggedDivider
properties to the Pane
class should be accompanied by appropriate initialization in the constructor to ensure they are correctly set up before use.
+ this.transit = false;
+ this.draggedDivider = null;
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
// the pane is in transition - ignore resize events | |
transit = false | |
draggedDivider = null | |
// the pane is in transition - ignore resize events | |
this.transit = false; | |
this.draggedDivider = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why should they? Isn't setting the property value enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daonb, initializing properties like transit
and draggedDivider
in the constructor of the Pane
class is generally considered good practice for several reasons:
-
Clarity and Intent: Initializing properties in the constructor explicitly declares the initial state of these properties when an instance of the class is created. This makes the code easier to understand and maintain, as it's clear what values the properties start with.
-
Avoiding Undefined State: JavaScript allows properties to be added to objects dynamically; however, if these properties are used before being explicitly set, they will be
undefined
, which can lead to runtime errors. Initializing them in the constructor ensures they have a defined value, reducing the risk of bugs. -
Consistency: Consistently initializing all properties in the constructor helps ensure that all instances of the class have the same set of properties, which can be important for consistency across different parts of the application.
While it's technically sufficient to set the property values directly (as JavaScript's flexibility allows for dynamic property assignment), doing so in the constructor enhances the robustness and readability of your code.
this.channelID = props.channelID | ||
this.needsResize = false | ||
this.catchGestures() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The method catchGestures
is called in the constructor but is not defined until later in the file. This could lead to maintainability issues. Consider reordering methods or clearly documenting their dependencies.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Style
Documentation
Chores