Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upstream 0.23.0 #134

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

Upstream 0.23.0 #134

merged 32 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

dbaranovstonfi
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

dbaranovstonfi and others added 30 commits December 19, 2024 08:52
impl #BE-1771: Library provider updated

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!300
Impl #BE-1843: Bencmark for contract emulator

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!301
NI: #BE-1771: fix vb comments

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!302
Downstream 0.22.4

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!303
Impl #NI: try fix another leak

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!305
Impl #BE-1881: Replaced dashmap by tokio::sync:Mutex to avoid mem leaks

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!308
Impl #BE-1846 : library cache

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!307
…/tonlib-rs into BE-1879"

This reverts commit 113ab4a, reversing
changes made to 672bf3d.
impl #BE-1879: Retrying invoke on connection

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!310
This reverts commit 0a88179, reversing
changes made to 63eba99.
Impl #BE-1892: Display for TonHash

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!312
Impl #BE-1839: Boxed long errors, updated builder methods

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!311
Impl: #BE-1893: Library provider trait and implementation of  BlockChainLibraryProvider

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!313
NI: bump tonlib-sys to 2024.10.4

See merge request ston-fi/rust/tonlib-rs!314
@dbaranovstonfi dbaranovstonfi merged commit b239b06 into main Jan 9, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants