Introduce new LLM client architecture #570
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Begin migration away from LiteLLM with a modular design: - Add new llmclient package with provider interface - Create bridge implementation to gradually migrate from LiteLLM - Simplify LLMClient class to use new provider system - Add type definitions for requests/responses This change sets up the foundation for removing the LiteLLM dependency while maintaining backward compatibility. Providers will be migrated incrementally in follow-up changes. I am trying to do this without stirring up the regression shit pot too much. Happy for others to recommend other approaches
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Begin migration away from LiteLLM with a modular design:
This change sets up the foundation for removing the LiteLLM dependency while maintaining backward compatibility. Providers will be migrated incrementally in follow-up changes. I am trying to do this without stirring up the regression shit pot too much. Happy for others to recommend other approaches