-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(kubernetes): tolerate an empty manifest in KubernetesDeployManifestOperation #6337
fix(kubernetes): tolerate an empty manifest in KubernetesDeployManifestOperation #6337
Conversation
…stOperation in case the result of a bake stage is empty. Without this there's: java.lang.NullPointerException at com.netflix.spinnaker.clouddriver.kubernetes.op.manifest.KubernetesDeployManifestOperation.getManifestsFromDescription(KubernetesDeployManifestOperation.java:234) at com.netflix.spinnaker.clouddriver.kubernetes.op.manifest.KubernetesDeployManifestOperation.operate(KubernetesDeployManifestOperation.java:75) at com.netflix.spinnaker.clouddriver.kubernetes.op.manifest.KubernetesDeployManifestOperation.operate(KubernetesDeployManifestOperation.java:48) because KubernetesDeployManifestDescription.getManifestsFromDescription assumes that description.getManifest() never returns null.
inputManifests = ImmutableList.of(manifest); | ||
|
||
// manifest may be null as well, so check | ||
if (manifest != null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hrmm, wondering if shouldn't log "Warning! Input manifest is null and description is null. Something is incorrect on the deployment most likely!" or similar. I'd not have though BOTH would be null... ALSO... won't this immediately fail below on lin 242 with an NPEsince inputManifests would be null in this check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I forget how this all works with description.getManifest()
vs description.getManifests()
, but apparently inputManifests isn't null in this case, so things work. If this did end up generating a NullPointerException, we'd have seen it. I have a vague memory that @mattgogerly may know something about this, but I think this change is OK. It's at least an improvement if it doesn't fix everything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
MOSTLY calling out the next line:
inputManifests = inputManifests.stream().filter(Objects::nonNull).collect(Collectors.toList());
inputManifests would be null, triggering an NPE if it got to the point of your null check. ....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess if the inputManifests.isEmpty()
would allow this to "work" without an NPE... that may be how this is working...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I figure that's what's happening.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SIGH I hate "it's working through a glitch" situations... but... approving. I could see a "TOOD" to note to fix this... but as long as it works it works... and tests'll catch it hopefully!
in case the result of a bake stage is empty. Without this there's:
because KubernetesDeployManifestDescription.getManifestsFromDescription assumes that description.getManifest() never returns null.