Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a new test for tasks #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024
Merged

Added a new test for tasks #9

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

shech2
Copy link
Owner

@shech2 shech2 commented Feb 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated authentication tests to streamline the testing process.
    • Added new test cases for task creation functionality, enhancing quality assurance.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 7, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
management-system ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2024 4:41pm

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve modifications to the testing suite of a web application. Specifically, the authentication test suite has seen a removal of database cleanup operations related to invites, teams, and users post-testing. Additionally, a new set of test cases for task creation using Playwright has been introduced in the task module, including provisions for logging in, setting up a browser context, and post-test database cleanup.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
tests/Auth/... Removed database cleanup operations from the afterAll hook.
tests/Tasks/... Added test cases for creating a task, including setup and cleanup.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where tests do play,
Changes afoot, both night and day.
Cleanup removed, tasks anew,
A rabbit's cheer, for the work you do. 🚀🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 7

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad5e29b and 2a47efe.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/Auth/auth.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/Tasks/task.spec.ts (1 hunks)

await page.getByPlaceholder('Email').fill(User.email);
await page.getByPlaceholder('Password').fill(User.password);
await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Log in' }).click();
pauseExecution(2000);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using pauseExecution(2000) introduces unnecessary delays in tests, affecting performance. Consider using page.waitForSelector or page.waitForFunction for more precise synchronization.

await page.getByPlaceholder('Title').fill('Test Task');
await page.getByPlaceholder('Description').fill('Test Description');
await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Create' }).last().click();
pauseExecution(2000);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using pauseExecution(2000) introduces unnecessary delays in tests, affecting performance. Replace with more precise synchronization methods like page.waitForSelector or page.waitForFunction.

Comment on lines +33 to +51
test.afterAll(async () => {
// Clean up the database after all tests are done
await prisma.invite.deleteMany({
where: {
email: User.email,
},
});
await prisma.team.deleteMany({
where: {
name: User.teamName,
},
});
await prisma.user.deleteMany({
where: {
email: User.email,
},
});
await context.close();
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Database cleanup in test.afterAll is directly manipulating the database, which might not be ideal for test isolation and could affect other tests if run in parallel. Consider using transactional tests or a more isolated approach to database management for testing.

Comment on lines 9 to 14
let context: BrowserContext;
let page: Page;

test.afterAll(async () => {
// Clean up the database after all tests are done
await prisma.invite.deleteMany({
where: {
email: User.email,
},
});
await prisma.team.deleteMany({
where: {
name: User.teamName,
},
});
await prisma.user.deleteMany({
where: {
email: User.email,
},
});
});

test.beforeAll(async ({ browser }) => {
context = await browser.newContext();
page = await context.newPage();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The import of prisma is unnecessary if database cleanup operations have been removed from the afterAll hook.


📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The import of bcrypt is unnecessary if the test no longer involves creating or manipulating user passwords directly in the database.


📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The import of Provider from @prisma/client is unnecessary if the test no longer involves creating users or other entities that require specifying a provider.


📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The import of pauseExecution is used, but consider replacing it with more precise synchronization methods like page.waitForSelector or page.waitForFunction to avoid unnecessary delays in tests.

@shech2 shech2 merged commit 759ecbf into main Feb 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@shech2 shech2 deleted the Added-tests-for-task branch February 7, 2024 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant