Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 6.2] fix(sct_config): scylla-server-upgrade-target wasn't reported to Argus #9688

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Jan 7, 2025

ARGUS_VERSION_RE wasn't covering plain version like 6.3.0~dev hence not sending it out to Argus.

the change is fixing the regex

this change also fixes get_branch_version to be able to return a full version string (including git sha and a date), cause we know Argus would need this data for metrics graphs and perf summaries.

also not having this information, is causing confusion on patch releases, when test are not get to the phase a node is upgrades

Ref: scylladb/argus#533

Testing

PR pre-checks (self review)

  • I added the relevant backport labels
  • I didn't leave commented-out/debugging code

Reminders

  • Add New configuration option and document them (in sdcm/sct_config.py)
  • Add unit tests to cover my changes (under unit-test/ folder)
  • Update the Readme/doc folder relevant to this change (if needed)

(cherry picked from commit 7d2d0bb)

Parent PR: #9638

`ARGUS_VERSION_RE` wasn't covering plain version like `6.3.0~dev`
hence not sending it out to Argus.

the change is fixing the regex

this change also fixes `get_branch_version` to be able to return
a full version string (including git sha and a date), cause
we know Argus would need this data for metrics graphs and perf
summaries.

also not having this information, is casuing confusion on patch
releases, when test are not get to the phase a node is upgrades

Ref: scylladb/argus#533
(cherry picked from commit 7d2d0bb)
@mergify mergify bot assigned fruch Jan 7, 2025
@fruch fruch merged commit c65c51e into branch-6.2 Jan 8, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant