-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
test: add ASSET
variable in Fork.t.sol
to store forked asset
#287
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks fine
Note: this PR may cause a lot of conflicts on Should we merge this into |
I agree. If it's not a very critical issue (which I think it's not), even my opinion is to merge this PR against the staging branch. Do we all agree then? |
I personally agree |
de1ac19
to
79c1f26
Compare
I've updated this against |
@andreivladbrg do you want to review it once more so that I can merge it into staging? It can be merged independently and I will update other PRs according to the changes introduced by this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now
1804e53
to
8276e73
Compare
071e97e
to
87812a7
Compare
refactor: name default test asset to "dai" test: use low-level call to approve contract via approveContract() doc: add dev comment to USDC.t.sol and USDT.t.sol build: include ffi config in default foundry profile
87812a7
to
17ec78b
Compare
* test: add "ASSET" variable in Fork.t.sol to store forked asset refactor: name default test asset to "dai" test: use low-level call to approve contract via approveContract() doc: add dev comment to USDC.t.sol and USDT.t.sole * test: define a computeMerkleLockupLLAddress without asset_ parameter
closes #286
Summary
asset
todai
when referring to the default test asset.