Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #135715

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #135715

merged 13 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

GuillaumeGomez and others added 13 commits January 17, 2025 22:36
```
error: `A` has no fields, `..` needs at least one default field in the struct definition
  --> $DIR/empty-struct.rs:16:17
   |
LL |     let _ = A { .. };
   |             -   ^^
   |             |
   |             this type has no fields
```
…ddle

[rustdoc] Replace module list items `ul`/`li` with `dl`/`dd`/`dt` elements

`@hywan` suggested that rustdoc should use `dl`,`dt` and `dd` HTML tags for listing items on module pages as it matches better what this is (an item and optionally its description). This is a very good idea so here is the implementation.

Also nice side-effect of this change: it reduces a bit the generated HTML since we go from:

This PR shouldn't impact page appearance.

```html
<ul class="item-table">
  <li>
    <div class="item-name">NAME</div>
    <div class="desc docblock-short">THE DOC</div>
  </li>
</ul>
```

to:

```html
<dl class="item-table">
  <dt>NAME</dt>
  <dd>THE DOC</dd>
</dl>
```

You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/items-list/std/index.html).

r? `@notriddle`
Disallow `A { .. }` if `A` has no fields

```
error: `A` has no fields, `..` needs at least one default field in the struct definition
  --> $DIR/empty-struct.rs:16:17
   |
LL |     let _ = A { .. };
   |             -   ^^
   |             |
   |             this type has no fields
```
Consolidate ad-hoc MIR lints into real pass-manager-based MIR lints

It feels much cleaner to do all MIR-related things using the pass manager.
Some random compiler nits

The only "observable" change here is using `par_body_owners` for coroutine witnesses/coroutine obligation checking.

r? lqd (or reassign, you just seem to like to approve prs :3 )
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jan 19, 2025
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 19, 2025

📌 Commit c87dd96 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 19, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 19, 2025

⌛ Testing commit c87dd96 with merge 9857284...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 19, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 9857284 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 19, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 9857284 into rust-lang:master Jan 19, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Jan 19, 2025
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#135641 [rustdoc] Replace module list items ul/li with dl/`dd… 246fe184c2240c37ec7d8e063e1bfd5acae6ed44 (link)
#135703 Disallow A { .. } if A has no fields 4658c97e8adf533276230890646d31508abd5c5d (link)
#135705 Consolidate ad-hoc MIR lints into real pass-manager-based M… eacc211802ad42bf7d232956bbdad47a717b8a39 (link)
#135708 Some random compiler nits b6b970f64cc6c4785d980ef08309cee4affe6fab (link)

previous master: 01706e1a34

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (9857284): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.1%, secondary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.1% [1.1%, 1.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.9% [3.9%, 3.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.8% [-2.7%, -0.8%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.1% [1.1%, 1.1%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 765.933s -> 765.901s (-0.00%)
Artifact size: 326.08 MiB -> 326.07 MiB (-0.00%)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-9a18sxj branch January 25, 2025 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants