Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get rid of ToPolyTraitRef #135697

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

It's generally a footgun, since it throws away PredicatePolarity.

This PR doesn't attempt to fix any related bugs having to do with binders or polarity; it just tries to pass through TraitPredicates around instead of TraitRefs. There should be basically no functional changes.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 18, 2025

r? @davidtwco

rustbot has assigned @davidtwco.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 18, 2025
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jan 18, 2025

r? lqd @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2025

📌 Commit 2a180a9 has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 18, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2025
Get rid of `ToPolyTraitRef`

It's generally a footgun, since it throws away `PredicatePolarity`.

This PR doesn't attempt to fix any related bugs having to do with binders or polarity; it just tries to pass through `TraitPredicate`s around instead of `TraitRef`s. There should be basically no functional changes.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135616 (CI: split i686-msvc job to two free runners)
 - rust-lang#135623 (ci: use ghcr ubuntu image for mingw-check-tidy)
 - rust-lang#135640 (Drop MIPS glibc 2.23 patches that reside in crosstool-ng now)
 - rust-lang#135663 (Fix ICE in resolving associated items as non-bindings)
 - rust-lang#135677 (Small `rustc_resolve` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#135680 (coverage: Clean up a few things after the counters overhaul)
 - rust-lang#135697 (Get rid of `ToPolyTraitRef`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135616 (CI: split i686-msvc job to two free runners)
 - rust-lang#135623 (ci: use ghcr ubuntu image for mingw-check-tidy)
 - rust-lang#135640 (Drop MIPS glibc 2.23 patches that reside in crosstool-ng now)
 - rust-lang#135663 (Fix ICE in resolving associated items as non-bindings)
 - rust-lang#135680 (coverage: Clean up a few things after the counters overhaul)
 - rust-lang#135697 (Get rid of `ToPolyTraitRef`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d810c13 into rust-lang:master Jan 19, 2025
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135697 - compiler-errors:poly-trait-ref, r=lqd

Get rid of `ToPolyTraitRef`

It's generally a footgun, since it throws away `PredicatePolarity`.

This PR doesn't attempt to fix any related bugs having to do with binders or polarity; it just tries to pass through `TraitPredicate`s around instead of `TraitRef`s. There should be basically no functional changes.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Jan 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants