Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small rustc_resolve cleanups #135677

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yotamofek
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Don't open-code Reverse
  2. Use slice patterns where possible

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 18, 2025

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 18, 2025
None
extern_crate_names.sort_by_key(|&name| Reverse(name));

extern_crate_names
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is harder to read than the existing code. Can you revert it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, you're right, also doesn't fit the commit it was in. Reverted.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using Reverse here was actually wrong because I was ordering by Symbol (which orders by index) instead of its string repr. Unfortunately I had to revert to sort_by because of lifetime issues, but at least I could still use total ordering instead of partial.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2025

📌 Commit a909520 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 18, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2025
…piler-errors

Small `rustc_resolve` cleanups

1. Don't open-code `Reverse`
2. Use slice patterns where possible
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135616 (CI: split i686-msvc job to two free runners)
 - rust-lang#135623 (ci: use ghcr ubuntu image for mingw-check-tidy)
 - rust-lang#135640 (Drop MIPS glibc 2.23 patches that reside in crosstool-ng now)
 - rust-lang#135663 (Fix ICE in resolving associated items as non-bindings)
 - rust-lang#135677 (Small `rustc_resolve` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#135680 (coverage: Clean up a few things after the counters overhaul)
 - rust-lang#135697 (Get rid of `ToPolyTraitRef`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants