Merge pull request #20 from dgkf-roche/main

Update README.md

README.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ ___
 Time | Chair | Description
 --- | --- | ---
 8.50am | Phil Bowsher (Posit) | Intro to day 
-9-10am | Aaron Clark (Arcus) and Doug Kelkhoff (Genentech) | Driving Consensus Through Repositories<br>Following last year's open dialogue about shaping an industry standard repository, we're excited to share what's on the horizon. Through collaborations across the industry and the ecosystem of R repository tools, we're settling on a means of delivering consistent, reproducible quality assessments of packages.
+9-10am | Aaron Clark (Arcus) and Doug Kelkhoff (Roche) | **Driving Consensus Through Repositories** <br> Following last year's open dialogue about shaping an industry standard repository, we're excited to share what's on the horizon. Through collaborations across the industry and the ecosystem of R repository tools, we're settling on a means of delivering consistent, reproducible quality assessments of packages.
 10-11am | Natalia Andriychuk (Pfizer) and Nicole Jones (Denali) | Tackling risk in interactive data products (e.g. shiny validation) [Title TBC]
 11-11.15am | - | Bio-break
 11.15-12.30pm | James Black (Roche) | Community Panel. We ask people to take 3 post it notes, and on each give write down a response to each question (so one question per note): <ul><li>Q1: What is the biggest challenge your data science, or data science tooling, focussed team is facing today?</li><li>Q2: What questions to have on the impact of AI/LLMs?</li><li>Q3: If our industry could come together and form one position statement around data science and/or clinical reporting, what would it be?</li></ul> </br> Users asked to crumple up their post notes, then throw them as hard as they can across the room. Once finished, people asked to try and find 3 post it notes. Ask for volunteers to read out one of their post it notes.