Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CAGRA binary Hamming distance support #610

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: branch-25.02
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

enp1s0
Copy link
Member

@enp1s0 enp1s0 commented Jan 24, 2025

This PR adds the binary Hamming distance support to CAGRA.

dependency: #612

TODO:

  • Add Hamming distance dist_op for CAGRA search
    • Add DistanceType::BinaryHamming (because HammingUnexpanded is not bitwise operation)
  • Support graph build
    • Want to use the iterative graph build method that uses the CAGRA search for graph build (anaruse@5a80659) because otherwise the binary Hamming distance support for IVFPQ or NN Descent is additionally required.
  • Add CI test
    • GT creation
    • Add test cases
  • Test on some benchmark datasets

Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@enp1s0 enp1s0 self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
@enp1s0 enp1s0 added feature request New feature or request non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Jan 24, 2025
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Jan 25, 2025

/ok to test

Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Jan 27, 2025

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@enp1s0 enp1s0 marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2025 17:33
@enp1s0 enp1s0 requested review from a team as code owners January 27, 2025 17:33
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Jan 27, 2025

/ok to test

@enp1s0
Copy link
Member Author

enp1s0 commented Jan 28, 2025

@cjnolet Can you do /ok to test again?

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Jan 28, 2025

/ok to test

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Jan 30, 2025

/ok to test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CMake cpp feature request New feature or request non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants