Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ruff + fix FAQ + remove announcement #199

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025
Merged

ruff + fix FAQ + remove announcement #199

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025

Conversation

raphaelvallat
Copy link
Owner

Apply latest version of ruff (0.9.2) + fix divider in FAQ

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 19, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 29.26829% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.24%. Comparing base (83cb56c) to head (aa8b1d4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/yasa/evaluation.py 0.00% 29 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #199   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.24%   77.24%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2659     2659           
  Branches      324      324           
=======================================
  Hits         2054     2054           
  Misses        568      568           
  Partials       37       37           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@raphaelvallat raphaelvallat changed the title ruff + fix FAQ ruff + fix FAQ + remove announcement Jan 19, 2025
@raphaelvallat raphaelvallat merged commit 99b31a9 into master Jan 19, 2025
14 checks passed
@raphaelvallat raphaelvallat deleted the fix_doc_ruff branch January 19, 2025 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants