Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

further fixes for new false positives in unnecessary_lambda_linter #2248

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2023

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #2247

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2248 (5b4e614) into main (4a8b931) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 5b4e614 differs from pull request most recent head 5c89a8d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5c89a8d to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2248   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.65%   99.65%           
=======================================
  Files         114      114           
  Lines        5215     5215           
=======================================
  Hits         5197     5197           
  Misses         18       18           
Files Coverage Δ
R/unnecessary_lambda_linter.R 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico merged commit a6e20bb into main Oct 29, 2023
@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico deleted the ul-minus branch October 29, 2023 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False-positive in unnecessary_lambda_linter?
3 participants