Vendoring

[pachadotdev]

#340 but without the breaking changes

[pachadotdev]

@krlmlr hi, this allows u to vendor to src/vendor!
@hadley i keep the unlink() function in vendor.R examples to pass the local check(), but that then creates problems with pkgdown

[krlmlr]

Thanks. I'd wait for a comment on if we want to vendor into src/vendor at all. Perhaps there's a reason for vendoring into inst/include ?

[pachadotdev]

Thanks. I'd wait for a comment on if we want to vendor into src/vendor at all. Perhaps there's a reason for vendoring into inst/include ?

what i saw with check(), is that it doesn't like to put files in src, but if i vendor in src/vendor in a pkg project, it passes all checks for that another pkg

[krlmlr]

• The checks in this PR are failing
• This PR seems to have a bit of noise
• We don't know the maintainers' perspective on if this PR is a good, so I'm not sure if it's worth addressing the first two issues at all

Let's not spend too much time here for now?

[pachadotdev]

• The checks in this PR are failing

  • This PR seems to have a bit of noise

  • We don't know the maintainers' perspective on if this PR is a good, so I'm not sure if it's worth addressing the first two issues at all

Let's not spend too much time here for now?

sure, i was following from the vendoring in https://github.com/r-dbi/RPostgres/tree/main/src/vendor/boost