-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add previous/current route instances to RouterOnChangeArgs #389
Open
peabnuts123
wants to merge
3
commits into
preactjs:main
Choose a base branch
from
peabnuts123:feature/previous-route-instance
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you elaborate on how you'd use this? Just curious.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is already what
current
is. This PR just brings current/previous in parity with one-another. Currentlyprevious
is a string, whilecurrent
is a Route instance. Not only is this inconsistent, it makes it hard / impossible to implement logic that uses props from the previous route.I am depending on these changes in a project of mine, where I use this data to determine whether the user is navigating to/from the default route: use-case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ignoring the oddness of calling a browser refresh, why watch the props rather than the route?
Watching component props like this to me sounds like an anti-pattern. I'm not saying that this shouldn't get merged or anything but that there's almost certainly a better way to do what you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd love to find a work around. I need to know information about the previous route, but I cannot resolve this from the URL. I could manually build up a dictionary of this data myself, keyed by URL, and try and do this lookup myself (including mapping URLs to dictionary keys i.e. trimming query params, etc.), but really it is the responsibility of the Router to give me this information (especially, in my use-case above, whether a Route is the default route or not).