-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Flow decomposition][Reformat] Observer and NetworkUtil #149
[Flow decomposition][Reformat] Observer and NetworkUtil #149
Conversation
- Reformat observers in flow decompostion computer - Reformat NetworkUtil Signed-off-by: Hugo SCHINDLER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hugo SCHINDLER <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the refactoring and the utils tests. 😄
I think observers are much better placed now!
Question remains about the 2 TODO's and whether or not to include three windings transfomers in getPstIdList
.
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/NetworkUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/FlowDecompositionComputer.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/NetworkUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/NetworkUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/NetworkUtil.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/NetworkUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/NetworkUtil.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…osses_compensation_improvement branch but it is friday night Signed-off-by: Hugo SCHINDLER <[email protected]>
I added a lot of test with some "golden master" tests |
|
…ecomposition_improvements # Conflicts: # flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/FlowDecompositionComputer.java # flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/FlowDecompositionResults.java # flow-decomposition/src/test/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/TestUtils.java
Signed-off-by: Hugo SCHINDLER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hugo SCHINDLER <[email protected]>
Thank you for the review, I made some changes. Ready for review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow, thanks a lot for the work you put into this PR :)
I have only some minor comments
flow-decomposition/src/main/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/NetworkUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
flow-decomposition/src/test/java/com/powsybl/flow_decomposition/TestUtils.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Hugo SCHINDLER <[email protected]>
Waiting for a final green light to merge this PR |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
@OpenSuze it's all good for me! |
Signed-off-by: Hugo SCHINDLER <[email protected]>
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
The goal is to remove terminal setP and setQ in losses compensation PR #147.
I used this PR to reformat observers in flow decompostion computer and the NetworkUtils functions.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Reformating
What is the current behavior?
No change
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
No change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
Other information: