Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[UCTE] Refactor load export and allow multiple loads #3289

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

colinepiloquet
Copy link
Member

@colinepiloquet colinepiloquet commented Jan 27, 2025

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

No

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Feature and refactoring

What is the current behavior?

If a voltage level has multiple loads, then it will not be exported in UCTE.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
This PR allows export of multiple loads in UCTE and refactors a bit the code with a dedicated class for load export.
In case of multiple loads on an IIDM bus, a new UCTE Node is exported with:

  • Active load: the P0 of the loads on this bus are summed.
  • Reactive load: the Q0 of the loads on this bus are summed.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

@@ -2,6 +2,17 @@

<span style="color: red">TODO</span>

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure yet how to structure documentation.
For now, I just added this small documentation to keep track of how everything is exported and once I have a better idea of how everything is done, I can maybe restructure it a bit better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant