Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(PC-33784) feat(FF): remove wipNewHighlightThematicModule #7575

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

xlecunff-pass
Copy link
Contributor

Link to JIRA ticket: https://passculture.atlassian.net/browse/PC-33784

Flakiness

If I had to re-run tests in the CI due to flakiness, I add the incident [on Notion][2]

Checklist

I have:

  • Made sure my feature is working on web.
  • Made sure my feature is working on mobile (depending on relevance : real or virtual devices)
  • Written unit tests native (and web when implementation is different) for my feature.
  • Added a screenshot for UI tickets or deleted the screenshot section if no UI change
  • If my PR is a bugfix, I add the link of the "résolution de problème sur le bug" [on Notion][1]
  • I am aware of all the best practices and respected them.

Best Practices

Click to expand These rules apply to files that you make changes to. If you can't respect one of these rules, be sure to explain why with a comment. If you consider correcting the issue is too time consuming/complex: create a ticket. Link the ticket in the code.
  • In the production code: remove type assertions with as (type assertions are removed at compile-time, there is no runtime checking associated with a type assertion. There won’t be an exception or null generated if the type assertion is wrong). In certain cases as const is acceptable (for example when defining readonly arrays/objects). Using as in tests is tolerable.
  • Remove bypass type checking with any (when you want to accept anything because you will be blindly passing it through without interacting with it, you can use unknown). Using any in tests is tolerable.
  • Remove non-null assertion operators (just like other type assertions, this doesn’t change the runtime behavior of your code, so it’s important to only use ! when you know that the value can’t be null or undefined).
  • Remove all @ts-expect-error and @eslint-disable.
  • Remove all warnings, and errors that we are used to ignore (yarn test:lint, yarn test:types, yarn start:web...).
  • Use gap (ViewGap) instead of <Spacer.Column />, <Spacer.Row /> or <Spacer.Flex />.
  • Don't add new "alias hooks" (hooks created to group other hooks together). When adding new logic, this hook will progressively become more complex and harder to maintain.
  • Remove logic from components that should be dumb.

Test specific:

  • Avoid mocking internal parts of our code. Ideally, mock only external calls.
  • When you see a local variable that is over-written in every test, mock it.
  • Prefer user to fireEvent.
  • When mocking feature flags, use setFeatureFlags. If not possible, mention which one(s) you want to mock in a comment (example: jest.spyOn(useFeatureFlagAPI, 'useFeatureFlag').mockReturnValue(true) // WIP_NEW_OFFER_TILE in renderPassPlaylist.tsx )
  • In component tests, replace await act(async () => {}) and await waitFor(/* ... */) by await screen.findBySomething().
  • In hooks tests, use act by default and waitFor as a last resort.
  • Make a snapshot test for pages and modals ONLY.
  • Make a web specific snapshot when your web page/modal is specific to the web.
  • Make an a11y test for web pages.

Advice:

  • Use TDD
  • Use Storybook
  • Use pair programming/mobs

@xlecunff-pass xlecunff-pass force-pushed the PC-33784 branch 3 times, most recently from 6c5b450 to e1a4632 Compare January 24, 2025 10:50
@xlecunff-pass xlecunff-pass changed the title (PC-33784) feat(FF): remove wipNewExclusivityModule (PC-33784) feat(FF): remove wipNewHighlightThematicModule Jan 24, 2025
@xlecunff-pass xlecunff-pass merged commit 662caa3 into master Jan 24, 2025
55 checks passed
@xlecunff-pass xlecunff-pass deleted the PC-33784 branch January 24, 2025 16:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants