-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Bounds in output for Metadata::None variables #1188
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5ed2a20
fix: metadata::none output bounds
AstroBarker af6714e
tst: add option in advection example to test metadata::none output. A…
AstroBarker 9ac4e83
changelog
AstroBarker 73a32eb
gold file SHA
AstroBarker 1fbb058
update metadata_none_Var in advection example to fit block sizes. upd…
AstroBarker 20abe85
Merge branch 'develop' into develop
Yurlungur a064a26
updates to metadata none var test
AstroBarker 38e4e60
update SHA for golds
AstroBarker 71f3668
Merge branch 'develop' into develop
pgrete File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i just looked at the updated loop.
While I understand the fix going from mesh to meshbock, I now don't get the
ivar_lo
/ivar_hi
indexing.What's supposed to happen here? I could see this working if
ivar_lo
/ivar_hi replace the
n` index.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any comment on this? ping @AstroBarker
I'm happy to merge this without adding test to read the data (which would be great), but I'd like to understand this loop before merging as from my current understanding it might seem like being an unintended bug.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've updated the loop, removing the
ivar_lo/hi
stuff, which I agree was not necessary in the loop, and added a section to the hdf5 test that checks the contents of this variable. Sorry for the delay!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thanks!