Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add a test for the runtime upgrades #23

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023
Merged

Conversation

eshaben
Copy link
Contributor

@eshaben eshaben commented Dec 14, 2023

With the addition of the runtime upgrades page on the docs site (moonbeam-foundation/moonbeam-docs#819), this test ensures that we have the latest runtime version listed on that page. This will also be helpful for letting us know when we need to update links that use networks.<network>.spec_version

@eshaben eshaben requested a review from themacexpert December 14, 2023 06:12
@wuzhong-papermoon
Copy link
Contributor

Does it make sense to change the hardcoded runtime version? Maybe put it in .env?

@eshaben
Copy link
Contributor Author

eshaben commented Dec 18, 2023

Does it make sense to change the hardcoded runtime version? Maybe put it in .env?

@wuzhong-papermoon Since this is the only test that we need it for, I think its fine to keep it in the test file. I guess another part of my reasoning is that to add it to the .env file, we would need to ask opslayer to add it to the server that runs the tests, so I try to only add things to the .env that are sensitive or reused so that we don't need to ask opslayer to keep adding things

Copy link
Contributor

@themacexpert themacexpert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚢

@eshaben eshaben merged commit bead8c8 into main Dec 20, 2023
@eshaben eshaben deleted the eshaben/runtime-upgrades branch December 20, 2023 23:38
Copy link
Contributor

@wuzhong-papermoon wuzhong-papermoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Well done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants