Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2024.2: use uv instead of pip #520

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

2024.2: use uv instead of pip #520

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

berendt
Copy link
Member

@berendt berendt commented Jan 5, 2025

Installations with uv are a lot faster than with pip.

@berendt berendt added the zuul Release the dragons, run Zuul CI label Jan 5, 2025
Installations with uv are a lot faster than with pip.

Signed-off-by: Christian Berendt <[email protected]>
@berendt berendt added zuul Release the dragons, run Zuul CI and removed zuul Release the dragons, run Zuul CI labels Jan 5, 2025
@berendt
Copy link
Member Author

berendt commented Jan 5, 2025

@berendt berendt added zuul Release the dragons, run Zuul CI and removed zuul Release the dragons, run Zuul CI labels Jan 5, 2025
Copy link
Member

@osfrickler osfrickler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like switching to some obscure software that nobody uses just because the build process may be marginally faster. I also seem to remember that we settled this some time ago already?

@berendt
Copy link
Member Author

berendt commented Jan 6, 2025

This was a test because I installed it in the Cloud in a Box to speed up the deployment process. It's about 20% faster builds. This is not marginal. Almost 35k stars on Github also speak in favour of the relevance and use of the tool.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
zuul Release the dragons, run Zuul CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants