-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add formatted bugref and carryover flag for comments #5357
Conversation
Great PR! Please pay attention to the following items before merging: Files matching
Files matching
This is an automatically generated QA checklist based on modified files. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if it's a good idea to introduce "flags". To be able to answer that I suggest you start with updating the documentation to explain flags. Maybe that can show us if this too confusing or helpful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess a generic flagging mechanism makes sense. Can you update the documentation?
I suppose https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/136244 should be mentioned in the commit message.
b5f46a5
to
985b922
Compare
efc0b05
to
fca75d5
Compare
Looks like moving the code to the schema would mean refactoring lots of test code so I guess it is good enough.
d27fca5
to
905f974
Compare
8b3a4f4
to
a8dfe31
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5357 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.32% 98.32%
=======================================
Files 389 389
Lines 37320 37355 +35
=======================================
+ Hits 36694 36729 +35
Misses 626 626 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks generally good. I'd only avoid repetition in the CSS code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess the test changes are good. I only have a few remarks and also see the comments from my previous review.
Was my comment #5357 (comment) considered? |
fb7d6bd
to
fd018bc
Compare
done that now with #5357 (comment) |
6267a35
to
c0373be
Compare
Ticket: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/136244 Co-authored-by: Tina Müller (tinita) <[email protected]>
29a3102
to
883aee4
Compare
Ticket: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/136244