Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add close position test for rust sdk #660

Merged
merged 53 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025

Conversation

pauldragonfly
Copy link
Contributor

Add close position test for rust sdk

Key feature :

  • Add multiple combo test for close position

pauldragonfly and others added 30 commits December 18, 2024 03:07
Remove unused config function
…whirlpools into paul/add-increase-liquidity-test-rust-sdk
…m:orca-so/whirlpools into paul/add-decrese-liquidity-test-rust-sdk
…whirlpools into paul/add-increase-liquidity-test-rust-sdk
…whirlpools into paul/rust-sdk-add-position-test
…whirlpools into paul/add-increase-liquidity-test-rust-sdk
…m:orca-so/whirlpools into paul/add-decrese-liquidity-test-rust-sdk
Update program to handle multiple tick array when decrease
…whirlpools into paul/add-increase-liquidity-test-rust-sdk
@pauldragonfly pauldragonfly marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 20:04
Copy link
Member

@wjthieme wjthieme left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Think only the TS close position test does not have fees yet. Can you add as well?

Copy link
Member

@wjthieme wjthieme left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@pauldragonfly pauldragonfly merged commit 4a79e52 into main Jan 19, 2025
5 checks passed
@pauldragonfly pauldragonfly deleted the paul/add-close-position-test-rust branch January 19, 2025 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants