Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix handling of OrLink is search patterns #2882

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Nov 4, 2021

Conversation

linas
Copy link
Member

@linas linas commented Nov 4, 2021

This (partly) fixes issue #2664, specifically the comment
#2644 (comment)

linas added 25 commits November 3, 2021 15:28
This won't work, because sequentials have to accumulate groundings.
Thus, a different approach is needed to handle them in full generality.
Well, its now clear how we really have only two cases:
a clean sum, or a clean product.
Its not done because no one uses the pattern engine in this way.
In this case, define all the helpers before defining the main func.
@linas
Copy link
Member Author

linas commented Nov 4, 2021

Merging; tests pass, except for TemporalReasoningRulesUTest as noted in opencog/pln#60

@linas linas merged commit e3a91ab into opencog:master Nov 4, 2021
@linas linas deleted the top-level-search-parts branch November 4, 2021 21:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant