Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contrib/intel/jenkins: Migrate Intel CI scripts to internal repo and use new Intel CI module #9972

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

zachdworkin
Copy link
Contributor

Point public Jenkinsfile at scripts that have been moved to an internal repository.
Add functionality to support new Intel CI scripts that are inside the internal repository.
Update pathnames to support this.

@zachdworkin zachdworkin changed the title contrib/intel/jenkins: Migrate Intel CI scripts to internal repo contrib/intel/jenkins: Migrate Intel CI scripts to internal repo and use new Intel CI module Apr 2, 2024
Intel CI scripts have been moved to an internal repository. The jenkinsfile
needs to be updated to point at those instead of the ones in libfabric

Signed-off-by: Zach Dworkin <[email protected]>
…bfabric

Pipeline scripts have been put into an Intel internal repository for use instead

Signed-off-by: Zach Dworkin <[email protected]>
README needs to be updated to explain why there is only a Jenkinsfile 
in this folder now.

Signed-off-by: Zach Dworkin <[email protected]>
New CI Tool for running tests is an Intel internal project. It will
be referred to as CI in our Jenkinsfile.

Signed-off-by: Zach Dworkin <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@Juee14Desai Juee14Desai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job! Looks good to me.

@zachdworkin zachdworkin merged commit a358161 into ofiwg:main Apr 3, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants