Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prov/efa: Move struct efa_ep_addr to efa_base_ep #10702

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

a-szegel
Copy link
Contributor

struct efa_ep_addr is used in both the DGRAM and RDM providers, so the structure definition should be in a common file, and not an RDM only file.

@a-szegel a-szegel requested review from sunkuamzn and a team January 15, 2025 01:55
@a-szegel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I want bigger changes than this, closing.

@a-szegel a-szegel closed this Jan 15, 2025
@a-szegel
Copy link
Contributor Author

reopening, I think I do actually want this... baby steps

@a-szegel a-szegel reopened this Jan 15, 2025
@@ -27,6 +27,19 @@ struct efa_qp {
uint32_t qkey;
};

/* raw address format. (section 1.4) */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since you moved the code, you need to update the comment as now reader doesn't related section 1.4 to the protocol doc.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed the outdated comment.

@a-szegel a-szegel force-pushed the move-efa-ep-addr-to-base-ep branch from 4d46f35 to c52b718 Compare January 15, 2025 18:43
struct efa_ep_addr is used in both the DGRAM and RDM providers, so the
structure definition should be in a common file, and not an RDM only
file.

Signed-off-by: Seth Zegelstein <[email protected]>
@a-szegel a-szegel force-pushed the move-efa-ep-addr-to-base-ep branch from c52b718 to 4e47263 Compare January 16, 2025 16:43
@a-szegel a-szegel merged commit 77afcaf into ofiwg:main Jan 16, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants