Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[nrf noup] soc: nordic: add delay after wake up #1995

Conversation

adamkondraciuk
Copy link
Contributor

An additional delay after wake-up is needed.

@adamkondraciuk adamkondraciuk force-pushed the NRFX-6317-add-delay-at-wakeup branch from 98d1d02 to 13109f6 Compare September 4, 2024 07:24
@masz-nordic
Copy link
Contributor

Can you add a comment with why this is needed?

@adamkondraciuk adamkondraciuk force-pushed the NRFX-6317-add-delay-at-wakeup branch from 13109f6 to c5d62db Compare September 5, 2024 09:39
Copy link
Contributor

@anangl anangl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be justified why this delay is needed and why it is not applied upstream.

@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ static void suspend_common(void)

/* Disable retention */
nrf_lrcconf_retain_set(NRF_LRCCONF010, NRF_LRCCONF_POWER_DOMAIN_0, false);
nrf_lrcconf_poweron_force_set(NRF_LRCCONF010, NRF_LRCCONF_POWER_DOMAIN_0, false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks unrelated, and neither change has a comment that marks it as workaround or temporary when a better solution is in place

An additional delay after wake-up is needed.

Signed-off-by: Adam Kondraciuk <[email protected]>
@adamkondraciuk adamkondraciuk force-pushed the NRFX-6317-add-delay-at-wakeup branch from c5d62db to 35e01a9 Compare September 6, 2024 10:16
@karstenkoenig
Copy link
Contributor

To my understanding we shouldn't do the delay method but just wait for a proper fix in sysctrl that doesn't turn on closed loop for fll16m. or is this supposed to fix something else?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants