Document CetusGuard as a Docker socket proxy solution #14806
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I'm a heavy Netdata user and have the need to deploy it securely on Docker. Given how critical it is to give a service access to the socket, I've recently developed CetusGuard, a Docker socket proxy that has no dependencies, is distributed in an image built from scratch and allows to define narrower filtering rules than the currently proposed solution.
A complete example of a Netdata deployment with CetusGuard can be found here.
I'm not quite sure whether the best approach to this PR is to add CetusGuard as an alternative to the current solution or to replace it. I have chosen the second option because CetusGuard covers this use case completely.