Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Parser type for optional loose arg #494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

bensaufley
Copy link
Contributor

Wouter passes this second arg, and default parser accepts it and behaves differently when it's passed (e.g., it's needed for nested routes), so it seems useful to include in typing.

The default parser accepts this, and behaves differently when it's passed (e.g., it's needed for nested routes) so it seems useful to include in typing.
Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f2e3b8d) to head (32ebe04).
Report is 50 commits behind head on v3.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                v3      #494   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            1         1           
=========================================
  Hits             1         1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Owner

@molefrog molefrog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

@molefrog molefrog merged commit 48b63a9 into molefrog:v3 Dec 11, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants