refactor: use next_back instead of last on double-ended iterators (clippy::double_ended_iterator_last)
#262
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… (`clippy::double_ended_iterator_last`)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
leon-xd
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2025
hamzamust
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request includes changes to use
next_backinstead oflaston double-ended iterators. This resolves the newclippy::double_ended_iterator_lastlint. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#double_ended_iterator_last for more info on why this change is beneficial.crates/wdk-build/src/cargo_make.rs: Updated the test assertions to usenext_back()instead oflast()to retrieve the last element of the split string.